Font Size: a A A

Changes On The Clinical Efficacy Of Nasopharyngeal Cancer IMRT Target Delineation Way After Induction Chemotherapy

Posted on:2015-07-26Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:M YangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2284330467457275Subject:Oncology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:Nasopharyngeal carcinoma after induction chemotherapy grosstumor volume gross tumor volume, GTVnx, GTVnd) was significantly reduced.This study investigated the effects of GTV outline ways to target and normaltissue dose and clinical efficacy by inducing changes in tumor volume afterchemotherapy, and after the change.Methods:From February2012to March2014were treated100cases of Ⅱ-Ⅳof pathologically confirmed newly diagnosed patients with nasopharyngealcarcinoma, according to the random number will be divided into the use ofinduction chemotherapy in patients with primary tumors GTVnx before andafter induction chemotherapy in primary tumors GTVnx outline target groups(group A and group B). All patients use two cycles induction chemotherapy ofPF or TP program,then second CT scan and image fusion and the developmentof tumor volume measurements before and after induction chemotherapy IMRTplan, while observing all patients toxicity and clinical efficacy.Results:Before and after induction chemotherapy the primary tumor GTVnxaverage volume was31.62±19.31cm3and19.43±12.33cm3,(P=0.003)respectively; positive cervical lymph GTVnd19.89±13.44cm3and10.51±9.60cm3,(P=0.002) respectively.After induction chemotherapy the averagereduce volume of nasopharyngeal lesions and cervical lymph nodes were36%and49%, respectively. After induction chemotherapy target delineation group(group B) normal tissue dose is lower than after group(group A), in whichDmax of bilateral lens, Dmax of bilateral temporal lobes, Dmax of rightparotid gland, D33of left parotid gland, with significant difference betweentwo groups (P<0.05). The therapeutic effect was evaluated3months after theend of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, complete remission rate ofnasopharyngeal and positive neck lymph node was95%, including2cases of nasal pharyngeal residue (1cases in each group);3cases of cervical lymphnode residual (A group1cases,2cases of group B)(P>0.05). After a medianperiod of14months (3-25months) follow-up, all the patients overall survivalrate of OS was100%; the disease free survival rate(DFS) of two groups were:92.90%vs82.70%,respectively, there is no significant difference between thetwo groups (P>0.05). The progression free survival rates (PFS) of two groupswere:92.60%vs84.60%, respectively, there is no significant differencebetween the two groups (P>0.05),there were4cases of the bone metastasis,2cases of liver metastasis,1cases of esophageal cancer in second primarytumors,1cases of breast cancer in second primary tumors, there were all N3patients;1patients with nasopharyngeal recurrent, for patient with T4; longterm toxic side toxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy two groups aresimilar, there was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: After induction chemotherapy, the volume of nasopharyngealcarcinoma and positive cervical lymph node significantly reduced. According toGTVnx after induction chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal tumor targetdelineation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the target volume wassignificantly reduced, and the target dose not reducing conditions, normaltissues (temporal lobes, parotid gland, lens) dose reduction; and during thetreatment, treatment related toxicity in the tolerance range, the use of inductionchemotherapy of GTV as a tumor target plan does not affect the survival rate,also can obtain good clinical curative effect.
Keywords/Search Tags:Nasopharyngeal, induction chemotherapy, normal tissue dose, clinical efficacy, toxicity, survival
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
The Clinical Study Of TP Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy In Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients
TPF And GP Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy In Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Comparison Of The Clinical Efficiacy Of TPF Induction Chemotherapy With Different Dose Intense For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
The Survival Impact Of The Interval Between The Induction Of Chemotherapy And Radiotherapy And Neutropenia During The First Cycle Of Induction Chemotherapy In Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinom
The Treatment Outcome Effects Of Changing Target Delineation Of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy After Induction Chemotherapy For Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: One Prospective Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Prognostic Analysis Of Different Cycles Of Induction Chemotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma,and The Exploration On The Efficacy And Safety Of Sequential Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Radiotherapy Combined With Induction Chemotherapy
Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel,Fluorouracil Plus Nedaplatin Or Cisplatin Followed By Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Or Cisplatin For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matchin
The Clinical Observation Of Regime In Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients:Tpf Induction Chemotherapy Combined Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
Low-dose Fractionated Radiotherapy Combined With Induction Chemotherapy For T3-4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:A Prospective Phase Ⅱ Trial
10 Clinical Efficacy Of Cetuximab Combined With Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma