Font Size: a A A

Systemic Evaluation On The Therapeautic Effect Of Concurrent Chemoradiation In The Treatment Of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma A Meta-analysis Of The Phase Ⅲ Randomized Controlled Trials

Posted on:2015-05-01Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:R K BaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2284330467473491Subject:Public health
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:The primary target of this meta-analysis was to systematically assess theadditional value of concurrent chemotherapy(CCRT) to radiation in the intervention groupof locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in terms of overall survival (OS),regional recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR). The second target wasused to differentiate the difference for the treatment effectiveness between the concurrentchemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versusthe simple radiotherapy.Methods: Abiding by a set of meta-analysis protocols, twelve phase Ⅲ clinicalrandomized trials enrolled locally advanced NPC patients in endemic areas were selectedfrom CBM, MEDLINE and EMBASE.Using STATA software to combine the size effect(risk ratio, RR), we applied randomized effect model and fixed effect model in thestatistical analysis to obtain the results.Results: Twelve clinical randomized studies including2340patients were involved.Risk ratios(RRs)of2-year,3-year and5-year OS were0.63(95%CI:0.50~0.80),0.82(95%CI:0.69~0.98),0.89(95%CI:0.73~1.08), respectively. Correspondingly, theabsolute survival benefit is8%,5%and7%, respectively. The predictable benefit for CCRTgroup were available in the results of LRR and DMR.The analytical figures of RR were0.64(95%CI:0.48~0.85)for3-year LRR and0.67(95%CI:0.56~0.81)for3-yearDMR.The comparison between CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy vs RT were alsoestimated. RR of3-year OS was0.73(95%CI:0.58~0.91). The survival benefit of3-yearLRR and3-year DMR in the treatment group was obtained. RRs were0.65(95%CI:0.45~0.95)for3-year LRR and0.71(95%CI:0.54~0.92)for3-year DMR,respectively.Conclusion: Compare to the simple radiation therapy, CCRT is a better way for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients to improve OS. Meanwhile, patientsalso got the particular benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Keywords/Search Tags:nasopharyngeal carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, meta-analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, clinical randomized trial
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trail Of Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy And Adjuvant Chemotherapy For Local Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-A Meta-analysis
The Efficacy And Adverse Reaction Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-a Meta-analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials
A Randomized Controlled Trial Of Gemcitabine Or Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin In Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
The Efficacy And Safety Of Docetaxel,cisplatin And Fluorouracil(TPF)-based Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:a Meta-analysis
Induction Chemotherapy Plus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A Retrospective Study Of Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Induction Chemotherapy And/or Adjuvant Chemotherapy In The Treatment Of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Comparison Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed By Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone:a Meta-analysis
Study On Comprehensive Treatment Strategy Of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
10 Comparison Of The Clinical Efficacy Of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Or Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Alone For Treating Stage Ⅱ Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma