The Research For Paradigm Shift Under The Horizon Of Practical Aesthetics

After the founding of new China, the practice aesthetics, as the first and only dominant position in the academic localization of aesthetic theory, its position in modern Chinese aesthetics is not allow to ignore. But in terms of "practical aesthetics" itself, the development of the two aesthetic boom. since the fifties, across50s,60s and80s,which makes practical aesthetics become many scholars and confused theory system aesthetic theory, leads to the "practical aesthetics" has become a fuzzy concept. In this paper, the research of practice aesthetics should adopt a "paradigm shift". The so-called "paradigm", on the one hand, refer to core trend and basic concepts in the study of aesthetics, on the other hand is also used to refer to support its expansion of the background of the underlying domain after the core concepts of aesthetics theoryWe believe that from the perspective of paradigm shift,"practical aesthetics" is not actually a definite theoretical system. From the core concept, as a practical aesthetics is the most important concept of "practice". In the process, from50s,60s the big discussion of aesthetics, by the80s the practice aesthetics obtain the status of the mainstream discourse, which roughly experienced the rheological process "forward-covered by the concept of "social"-instead of "social" concept, gradually highlights its meaning, establish the status of its core concepts, from center to edge, gradually collapse in extension and interpretation". In this process, in terms of the meaning of the concept of "practice" itself, it does not have a unified the answer, but it presents a complicated pluralistic interpretation. From the60s, Li zehou considers the "external physical practice " as the concept of "practice" and Zhu guangqian considers the "practice" as the "self-actualization". To the80s. Li zehou put forward the foundational, marked by using tools to make tools of material production in the sense of "primitive practice"; Liu gangji considers a kind of "self-actualization" material as the concept of "practice"; and Jiang kongyang considers a human contact with the outside world, and the person’s whole life activity sense "life", as the meaning of the concept of "practice", so the significance of the concept of "practice" is not consistent. But in this concept under rheological and multi-source meaning interpretation, the development of the practice aesthetics also experience the two different conversion process between the underlying theory of domain of the " To the subjectivity of the theory of reflection " and " Subjectivity theory of survival".We believe that the so-called "practical aesthetics", essentially only will be placed in the core concepts of the theory of evolution and the underlying domain transformation, referred to as the paradigm shift process in order to show its significance...