| In recent years, writers of post-80s have begun to set foot in the writing of local novels, among which the writing of "local collapse" is a rather important topic. So when the "local collapse" meets with the post-80s writers, what will be the intergenerational difference after these two elements combine? This is the central issue that this paper will be discussing. From the regularized effect of intergenerational theory, this paper analyzes how the post-80 writers, combining with one’s own experience, evaluate local changes as a grower from the perspective of a child witness. In the meanwhile, this paper also discusses how the post-80s make an account of those extraordinary events in the process of local collapse with a naive local boy’s tongue.With the above mentioned questions, this paper will give an overall introduction to the writing phenomenon of "local collapse" in the first place. "Local collapse" belonging to the local transformation refers to the changes towards the negative direction in the transformational process. These changes always form deconstruction for the local lands. Therefore, the writing of "local collapse" is in fact the critics of realism towards the negative phenomenon in the process of local transformation by employing the utilitarian writing system of local novels. And the narration of the post-80s usually combines children fantasy, growing experience and "local collapse" from a unique angle reflecting the chaos. Specifically, their writings concentrate on three aspects:the psychological betrayal, natural recession and the collapse of order of local youngsters.The psychological betrayal of the local youngsters is the main focus for the post-80s writers. In their writing, the local collapse not only takes place in the real world, but also in people’s inner heart in the first place. Within people’s inner heart, the concept of locality has been under the state of eclipse. Such kind of eclipse has been going on internally and externally. The major presentation of the internal eclipse is the local youngsters’deny of the farmers’identity and the external collapse originates from the escaping mentality of leaving the local lands and going to the south. In the narration both internally and externally, readers and the post-80s have to admit a fact that even under the background of "local collapse", the local lands are neither a world for the local youngsters to place their souls nor a land for them to realize their dreams. Most of the time, it has become a burden for the local youngsters. And it is the sense of burden that leads to further collapse of the local lands in the objective world.The post-80s writers have also realized the issues of natural recession in the process of collapse. Natural ecology is the basis of everything. Thus if the relational networks of the objective world are under attack, so does the natural ecology. In the process of local collapse, the local ecology is no exception. But under the influence of the growing experience and the children’s romantic mind, the post-80s do not just yell emotionally but get used to taking in humanistic and imaginary elements, a mixed narrative method, in their writing when they make an account of the ecology.This can be firstly reflected on their presentation of the recession. They combine the humanistic recession with the natural recession and utilize the framework of "recession" in intergenerational ethics to narrate natural recession in order to tell the readers that all the recession in nature roots in human beings’ improper behaviors. Secondly, as for the presentation of the recessional consequences, the post-80s, taking advantage of their age, try to reveal thoroughly the refreshing childhood feelings through innocent eyes and rebellious minds so as to present the consequences of recession, namely the disappearance of spiritual beings, in a romantic way from the perspective of animism. By means of this mixed narrative, the post-80s narrate how they feel incapable in the meanwhile of feeling nervous when they face with natural recession as a local youngster.The collapse of order is the most touching part in the writing of the post-80s. The local collapse itself means the disorder of humanistic order is a rejection of the new order against the old. In the process of growing, due to the factor of age, the immature post-80s may not likely to have a deep and thorough insight into the causes and consequences of the humanistic collapse and may only see the emotional aspects, which creates the uniqueness of their writing. Through the emotional descriptions of these three phenomena, the post-80s local writers use bloody facts to tell us that in the process of local collapse, quantity has already influenced quality, the fact that usually being ignored. Therefore, they choose the way of teaching a lesson by presenting facts in order to raise alarm by leading us to focus on the quality changes that have already taken place.Through the writing of the three questions, with regards to the local collapse, the post-80s writers have achieved the intergenerational presentation of their own. Such kind of writing has great significance. On the one hand, faced with the tasks of transformation in this century for local novels and constrained by the habitual experience, the post-50s, post-60s and post-70s may find it hard to write when they begin the writing of breakdown. But as for the post-80s growing in the atmosphere of transformation, they can easily get rid of the shackles of transcendental ideas. Their courage to abandon and their mind of intergeneration provide them with helpful resources for originality. Therefore, when local collapse meets the post-80s’ intergenerational perspective, the combination of these two can provide a feasible way for the question how the local can realize transformation. On the other hand, the post-80s’writing has been facing with a transformational challenge. The post-80s who have been at the end of their adolescence need a way to transit from being impatient and rebellious to being mature and responsible in their writing. And the writing about local collapse provides such a possibility for the post-80s to become mature and responsible. The successful trials of these writers turning to local writing can also provide referential experience to those post-80s who are still making struggles and feeling impatient. In such a way, the local transformation and the post-80s’ transformation realize a win-win situation. |