Research On The Rural Collective Economic Dispute Of Huicheng District Huizhou City

With the relaxation of urban development and land policy, more and more farmers losetheir land，farmers have feet into the city, the rural collective economy developed rapidly andtherefore, each villager can share gains are substantial. With the process of urbanization andindustrialization in rural areas to accelerate the rural collective economic pie is growing, ruralcollective economic disputes has become one of the major internal contradictions of villagerautonomy, restricting the rural collective economic development and vitality, but also affect socialharmony and stability in rural areas. This paper focuses on the rural collective economicorganization members disputes and rural collective economic organizations, namely the disputebetween the villagers and the village collective, the government will help to further deepen therelationship between management and citizen awareness of autonomy in theory, to furtherimprove the rural villager autonomy system. This study could provide a direct benefit to the citygovernment’s decision making, help promote local solutions rural collective economic disputes,protection of farmers’ rights and ease rural conflicts have practical significance.I used to work in the reality of the theoretical benefits of urban studies at home and abroad towrite this article, according to the research status, comparative analysis, problem-solving researchideas, through literature research, interviews and case analysis, the benefits of city status of therural collective economic disputes conduct analysis and resolution mechanisms, and the SouthChina Sea, the two Daya巳ay settlement mechanisms are compared in order to clarify the statusof a full range of benefits of urban rural collective economic disputes, find ways and specificmeasures to effectively address the rural collective economic disputes.Manifestations of rural collective economic disputes, complex reasons. Hui District of existingsettlement mechanism is not sufficient to fundamentally change the status quo, not only to theintroduction of specific practical guidance documents, but also the implementation of ruraljoint-stock reform, but also rely on social forces, multi-pronged approach, tackling the problem.