Abductive Reasoning In Judgment Of Character Evidence

Research and predicting human behavior characteristics and laws, the best pointcut is the character, but the character as evidence during proceedings will bringmany problems, even in well-established British and American legal developmentcountries, the use of character evidence also a lot of controversy. In civil law, thecharacter evidence in judicial practice is not uncommon to use, but only as a kind ofjustice in the judicial practice of tacit knowledge.In this paper, this perspective unlogic reasoning is derived from the analysis ofcharacter evidence in judicial proceedings of use. Abductive reasoning is a revocableaddition deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning logical reasoning outside thethird, this logic in the form of traditional deductive reasoning and inductivereasoning is essentially different, it is to recognize the logical approach of newthings and new knowledge. Introduced an important concept in law deducedreasoning, legal proceedings will be the fact that the evidence of a significant changein other areas. Therefore, this article will introduce the character judgments deriveinference reasoning among the proposed theoretical model is to determine thecharacter of dialectical reasoning can be abolished by design permits reasoning toexplain the derivation of evaluation and judgment of character, combined with theuse of character evidence of current situation, put forward specific ideas, with aview of the theory of evidence and judicial practice benefit.