With the changes in the living conditions, demand of property services growing.propertyservices is becoming an indispensable part of the lives of the residents, has a closerelationship with the people living. Security of property within the residential area is a majordemand of the owners, is also one of the main duties of the property service enterprise.Facing the realty service industry’s rapid change, the relevant provisions of our legal on theproperty service enterprise security obligations is not perfect, property owners and propertyservices companies signed a service contract on the issues related to the agreement is not clear,resulting in a judicial security disputes between owners and property services companies tohandle the more chaotic situation in practice. This has become an important legal obstacle thathinder the development of the property services industry and is not conducive to defuse theconflict between the owners and property service enterprise. This article by the analysis to thecase of Wang v. a property services company, Strive to clear vehicle management legalrelationship between the owners and property services companies and the legal responsibilityof vehicle lost that property service enterprise should bear.This paper is divided into three parts:Part Ⅰ: introduces the basic facts of the case and the focus of controversy. Through theintroduction of the merits, leads to the focus of controversy.Part Ⅱ: Comments on the case the focus of controversy. This part is the main part of thepaper. Analysis the four controversial issues by related theory and the law: Whether ownersand property services companies has set up a vehicle storage contracts, What is the basis ofsafeguards obligations of the plaintiff? Whether the defendant in violation of the realty servicecontract? whether the defendant violates safeguards obligations?Part Ⅲ: Through the above analysis of the case, come to the conclusion. |