Simple Discussion On Perfecting The Procuratorial Organs Practice Illegal Evidence Elimination Rule Applies

The trend of the development of the illegal evidence exclusion as criminal litigation, has been established by most of the country under the rule of law in the world. As China’s progress of rule of law, illegal evidence exclusion rule is written into the Chinese criminal law.2010three projects jointly issued the<about to review death penalty cases judgment evidence provisions on some issues of>and<criminal case concerning the provisions on some issues of excluding illegal evidence>, In2012the new revision of the criminal procedure law has made the principle rules of illegal evidence elimination rule, But. the provisions under the environment of China’s existing judicial operability is not strong. As a prosecutor, combined with the practical work in contact with the case, from the perspectives of examination and prosecution of illegal evidence exclusion rules on the implementation of practical difficulties, and put forward the perfect proposal.This paper is divided into five main parts:The first part of the paper’s introduction. The second part is a general overview of the illegal evidence exclusion rule, including the scope of the concept and theoretical basis, legal source and value system. The third part describes the procuratorial organs for the difficulties of the illegal evidence elimination rule. The fourth part of yanbian area dealing with illegal evidence by the department of public prosecution review methods and standards for the past, also is the core of this paper, mainly narrates the problems in the judicial practice. The fifth part related Suggestions to perfect the illegal evidence exclusion system in China. The sixth part is the conclusion, to review related issues and expectations. Illegal evidence exclusion rule in our country has just started, involves the whole judicial system reform, the problem a lot, although some Suggestions are put forward in this article, according to the case work, but still need to jurists and legal workers in a concerted effort to improve.