Study On Incrimination Of Pickpocketing Acts

Pickpocketing behavior has serious social harm, in order to protect people’spersonal and property safety and maintenance of social order, the pickpocketincriminating acts necessary and reasonable. Incriminating behavior frompickpocketing to achieve the purposes of building the rule of law in criminal justicehas a very important role in weight is an indispensable part of the work on theestablishment of the rule of law to achieve justice for the people, promoting justice,embodied judicial authority and legal deterrence, an extremely important role. Butsince pickpocketing behavior has led to a variety of incriminating controversy.Incriminating acts of pickpocketing theory and judicial practice there are differentopinions, even some people think is not necessary to combat pickpocketing byincriminating behavior, relevant laws and regulations can be considered prior to curbthe spread of such acts, and some scholars believe that in order not to incriminate theamount of pickpocketing, plot, as the number of restrictions. Of course this is part ofa legislative problem in understanding, but in pickpocketing incriminating behaviorinherent imperfections is also an important issue.After May1,2011,"Criminal Law Amendment(Eight)" Effectiveimplementation, pickpocketing incriminating behavior has also become one of thehighlights of the changes. The legislative branch can be seen protruding attention tosocial harm, the people reacted strongly to punish violations. March8,2013, theSupreme Court of the Judicial Committee held its1571meeting, March18,2013,the Supreme People ’s Procuratorate held a number of issues " on the handling ofcriminal cases of theft by applicable law1st meeting of the Twelfth ProsecutorialCouncil interpretation " would pickpocketing behavior defined as" stealing otherpeople in public places or on public transport to carry goods, and should berecognized as " pickpocketing "." The judicial interpretation of serious damage tosocial order, endanger the livelihood of pickpocketing behavior for the first timedefines a formal definition can be found in our criminal justice system more and moreemphasis on punishing acts of pickpocketing and continuous improvement. However,compared with the general theft, pickpocketing behavior has its own unique side,must not simply constituent elements and theft prosecution standards generally usedin the treatment pickpocketing behavior. In this paper, based on this, by feature comparison, make relevant legislative proposals and specific implementation details.Firstly, the characteristic behavior to make a statement pickpocketing and theftwere compared with the general description, elaborate pickpocketing behaviorincriminating significance. China’s current criminal law for the existence of statutoryacts on pickpocketing many defects and vulnerability analysis, under the promotionof pickpocketing incriminating behavior justify the premise, to make up deficiencies,correct the problem, and further standardize and improve the proposals put forwardhimself.