Study On The Identification System Of The Judicial Accounting In Procuratorial Work In China

Along with judicial reform pace, the procuratorial business in China’s development has not adapt to the identification system of synchronous development of litigation value and evidence system, this phenomenon to some extent weaken the seriousness of judicial authentication, caused widespread concern in the community. The revised "the people’s Republic of China Criminal Procedure Law" has been officially implemented, compared to the old law of criminal procedure, the new criminal law is a major bright spot with particular emphasis on the identification of judicial accounting in the core role of evidence investigation. In case investigation, especially the investigation of crimes of the prosecution, judicial accounting appraisal is very important. At the same time, the procuratorial organs as the state legal supervision organ, on behalf of the state to exercise the right of legal supervision. Supervise the investigation, the public security organs of the court trial and punishment, in addition, the procuratorial organs of the malfeasance, corruption and bribery cases of its own investigation and criminal prosecution on behalf of the state, safeguard the social fairness and justice. As a judicial entity organs, procuratorial organs should be how to correctly exercise the judicial power, how to perfect the judicial system in the procuratorial business?In this paper, the identification system of the judicial accounting in procuratorial work in China as the research object, starting from the clear identification of judicial accounting connotation, basic theory of judicial accounting identification, in-depth analysis of the judicial accounting identification system in procuratorial work in China legal basis, legislation and judicial practice, in order to reveal its unique in procuratorial work in China judicial functions, and the system of judicial accounting appraisal present situation, problems are analyzed, and on this basis, full account of the status quo, justice in China learn from the advanced experience of foreign criticism, reasonable basis of existing legislation and theoretical results, put forward specific ideas on the construction of the system.