| In this paper, according to the analysis of the current situation to the full disclosure ofthe patent system, find the defect of the current system and explores the root causecombined with the practice review. And after a comparative study with the relevantsystem of the United States, Europe, made full disclosure to further improve our patentsystem comments and suggestions in order to better achieve the legislative purpose ofpatent law, to encourage innovation, while also promoting social progress.This paper consists five major chapters. The chapter one theoretically analysis fullydisclosure to the patent system,which comprise a comprehensive exposition of themeaning of the system, the legal basis for the existence of the value of the system and thelegal consequences of a breach may incur.The chapter two to chapter four were fully disclosed the patent judgment from thesubject, object and how to determine the criteria of the three aspects. Thencomprehensive analyze the defect and reasons for the existence of the patent system fullyopen by comparing the related systems between United States, Europe and China, identifythe differences between China and foreign countries to fully open system and analyze thereasons for such differences exist.The fifth chapter traces the historical evolution of full disclosure of the patent systemto explore the system of administrative enforcement scale changes. And to evaluate thereference patent system in his country fully disclosed to our country, the author putsforward a number of suggestions for improving the current laws and regulations of ourpublic system. |