Signatures Of The Cross-examination Of Expert Opinion Research On Technical Issues

Throughout the traditional identification of attendance for cross-examination, the prevalence of cross-examination, saying the difficult admissible expert opinion and other issues. New Civil revised Criminal Procedure Law, one of the highlights is the introduction of Expert Assistant System. The establishment of this system of identification of attendance for cross-examination raised new challenges; similarly, Expert Assistant is also faced with the problem of how to conduct effective cross-examination. Handwriting is difficult, more difficult signature handwriting, signature handwriting expert opinion often determines the direction of the case. Practice in the identification, signature handwriting is the main content of the instrument identification. To ensure the effectiveness of the signature handwriting expert opinion to prove in litigation can play an important role, but to make up for lack of people to participate in the proceedings of expertise, should Signatures provide more detailed views of cross-examination, comprehensive reference content. Based on the content of signature handwriting cross-examination, for identification of people, to carry out their activities have a more stringent identification requirements; at the same time, also has a square cross-examination of the cross-examination of handwriting signature references, to a certain extent, make up for their professional lack of knowledge. Detailed cross-examination not only regulate the content of the activities identified objectivity, but also to protect the cross-examination of substantive meaning of the play.This paper identified a technical point of view, the cross-examination of handwriting signature review focused on the admissibility stage, the testing phase, the comprehensive judgment stage and related content identification instruments involved in the production. In accepting the review phase focused on the preliminary investigation stage, check samples, examine samples and acceptance procedures four aspects; testing phase cross-examination, including separately test, comparison tests, inspection records three aspects; at the comprehensive judgment, the judgment of the differences between the nature of the, judge-conformity quality, comprehensive analysis and expert opinion from four fronts cross-examination; cross-examination of identification documents, including the selection of the types of instruments, the narrative part of the three aspects of the picture section.