Research On The Implementation Security Of Administrative Monopoly Antitrust Regulations

The value of the anti-monopoly law is to protect fair competition in the market, improve economic efficiency and safeguard the interests of consumers and the public interests. With the development of the economy, the role of the anti-monopoly not only reflect on the intervention in the field of economic phenomena, but also reflect on the adjustment of the administrative power abuse and the market order destruction. Because our country is the socialist market economy system, which is different from the capitalist countries and administrative power intervention in the economy, hindering economic normal and free running phenomenon is more serious and widespread, the antitrust laws should be carried out on the administrative monopoly regulation. In this paper, which is based on China’s current national conditions, comparing the experience of other countries, analysis how to more effectively guarantee the implementation of the administrative monopoly law, then we can provide feasible suggestions in China on how we can govern executive monopolistic behavior.The essay should be divided into four parts. The first part introduces the value of anti-monopoly law and the notion of administrative monopoly, including, feature, cause of formation and the value of guarding the applying of administrative anti-monopoly law. The second part makes an analysis of the current situation of the administrative monopoly in China anti-monopoly law implementing regulation, mainly keeps an eye on the aspect of administrative monopoly legislation present situation. We can get to realize the problems of implementation of administrative monopoly in our country’s anti-monopoly law:the legislative reason, legal liability and law implementation institution, and then how to easily regulate administrative monopoly implementation laying practice base. The countries of the third part of the economic system of the economically developed countries, on behalf of the United States, Japan and Russia, Ukraine. We get to explore the situation suitable use for reference by China. The fourth part which is based on Chinese national reality, showing the real situation of Chinese administrative monopoly antitrust regulation implementation, proposing appropriate solutions to the problem, which is also a key part of the article. This section is mainly based on the lack of measures to improve the legislative level, the proposed legislation and how the bear corresponding legal liability. The law enforcement agencies should be set up. The total height of the effective regulatory framework of the Constitution should be advised. How to improve the protection of the court decision mechanism of administrative monopoly antitrust regulations to safeguard the implementation of the law can be put forward.