Study On The Act Of The Borrower Has Not Been Returned To The People

About study on the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people familiar with, there has been a dispute, also there are various differences in the criminal proceeding. Defining the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people is the prerequisite to its precise qualitative, only after defined the content and outreach of the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people, cleared the meaning of the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people, on this basis, the existing controversies viewpoints introduction and commentary, before it can be made to the standards of justice about the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people.The content of the act of " borrower has not been returned to the people" including the targets( " people "), the manner( " borrower "), the consequence( " not been returning") in three parts. The act has features of a wide range of the targets, manners in several ways and serious damage, from the types, based on whether the intent of illegal having of a standard, can be divided into the illegal possession of type and the legitimate use of type, to object if a particular standard, you can define an object type and object into limited type.Currently, the study on illegal possession of type, said crime of fraud in financing, said contract fraud, said of fraud, the study on the legitimate use of type, said crime of illegal absorbing public savings, said not guilty.To achieve accurately study on the act of the borrower has not been returned to the people, to establish a standard of its judicial process, we need to clear up some related theoretical issues, including: how to account the intent of illegal having, fraud crime deliberate whether to include indirect intentional, fraudulent methods to distinguish whether the impact of this crime and other crimes, and how to " public " scientific and rational definition. By explicitly judicial qualitative criteria related theoretical issues, to extract the relevant factors of the qualitative impact, they can make specific comments on the borrower has not been returned to the people handling the qualitative behavior, the type of conduct qualitative form of the loan were not to return to the people of the idea of the behavior of the steps. The illegal possession of any object type may constitute crime of fraud in financing, contract fraud, fraud, or crime of illegal absorbing public savings. The illegal possession of quadrant type may constitute contract fraud, fraud, or not guilty. The legitimate use of any object type may constitute crime of illegal absorbing public savings. The legitimate use of quadrant type may constitute crime of illegal business, transfer loans in high interest,or not guilty.