Font Size: a A A

Research On Public Hearing Participants’ Election In Administrative Decision-making Hearing

Posted on:2016-04-26Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:G Y YangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2296330479494422Subject:Administrative Management
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
When administrative decision-making hearing concerns public interest and legal right, Public participants who face with hearing organizer with more members of all kinds of participants, is selected by election or specific means as single person or group which represents public and public interest to state their opinions to the topic in administrative hearing. Also the institution of public hearing participants’ election plays significant role in promoting information publicity of government, encourage public participate in public decision making and balance diverse social interest. With the developing of will and self-cultivation of public political participation, public more appeal to participate in the election. Therefore, improving it is meaningful to government administration with fairness, justice, publicity, preserving social stability and establishing harmonious society. Nowadays, the election in China encounters problems: legal relative is imperfect, especially in content and quantity; public hearing participants’ right does not get enough ensure, public faces with information asymmetry; the election lack of organizational participation; bounded rationality, misperceptions and self-interest motivation causes negative effect to the election, which results in election inefficient. This paper takes public participants’ election of administration decision-making hearing as research object, and price hearing in Guangzhou for example. Paper brings out suggestions to improving public participants’ election bases on research.Paper takes price hearing in Guangzhou for example, and tries to find out problems of the election under hearing institution(take price hearing for example) in China, and brings out suggestions and strategies. For example like applying to enact more relative laws; improving information publicity institution; innovating forms of public organizational participation; popularizing the cognition of public hearing participants’ election and improving the quality of public participate in public hearing participants’ election. It comes to the result that improving public participants’ election should: Places hopes on government, by dint of public. For government, it should tough up sense of serve for public, improve participants’ election mode with scientific way, take multi-interests as rule of participants’ election, enact and enhance more relative laws and regulations and transparent the procedure of participants’ election. For public, they should rely on both new and old-fashion media to monitor participants’ election.
Keywords/Search Tags:Administrative Decision-making Hearing, Public Hearing Participants, Election, Price Hearing
PDF Full Text Request
Related items