In 2013, the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the CPC focus on judicial reform once more. One of the most important content is to promote the reform of the people’s jury system. As an important judicial democracy system, people’s jury system plays an important role to promote judicial reform procedure. The Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the CPC made the decision on "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Some Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively advancing rule of law", which put forward specific requirements for the people’s jury system. It included proposed to improve the system, security rights, expand the scope and random lottery, improving the public credibility of the judiciary; gradually implement the people’s jury not to hear the applicable law, only to participate in the facts of the case identified to the Fourth Plenary Session of the party’s eighteen The Supreme People’s court and the Ministry of justice promulgated the "people’s jury system reform pilot work implementation approach", in the nationwide selection of representative and intermediate people’s court to carry out the reform of the jury system. The people’s jury system has once again aroused people’s attention and hot debate. The people’s jury system plays a key role in the supervision of the judiciary, the realization of the judicial democracy and the public. At present, the judicial reform is in full swing, in this context, the people’s jury system is capable of carrying out the historical task of judicial democracy, it is worth our re examination and consideration. Through the analysis of the origin of the jury system in our country, the paper finds out the problems and the focus of the people’s jury system in our country, and explores the way to solve the problem. The article is divided into three parts.In the first chapter, the jury system is re examined, including the introduction, development, operation and the results of the judicial reform. The first part is a comprehensive review of the development of the jury system in China. The modern jury system is a product of the development of judicial democracy, its development is from arbitrary justice to the pursuit of rational judicial process. Due to the limitation of historical conditions, the late Qing Dynasty to the jury system in the Republic of China and the Republic of China period of the attempt failed. The people’s jury system in accordance with the implementation of the people’s jury system has the characteristics of representative and extensive. In view of the different historical periods, the connotation and extension of the people’s jurors are constantly changing. The second part of the court in two as an example, the present situation of our people’s jury system for on-the-spot investigation. At present, the people’s jury system in our country has made great progress in the scope of the trial and the trial of the case. The third part describes the remarkable results of the jury system in the judicial reform in our country.In the second chapter, the author points out the problems of people’s jury system in the judicial reform and the focus of the controversy. Under the premise of judicial reform, the people’s jury system can not meet the needs of judicial democracy. The first part discusses the concept of the people’s jury system in our country, the deviation and the absence of legislation and judicial system. The second part analyzes the focus of the people’s jury system, trying to reverse the situation of the people’s jury system and the social needs.In the third chapter, the paper puts forward the basic way of improving the people’s jury system in the process of judicial reform. The people’s jury system for promoting the judicial democracy has important significance, not because of a temporary problem to deny its progressive significance. What we should do is route to improve the design of the people’s jury system, through system constantly revised and improved, so that the play to promote the function of the judicial democracy in the process of judicial reform. |