On The Reasonable Pressure, Reasonable Guidance And Legal Means Of Deception In The Interrogation Tactics

Illegal Evidence in 2012 established the exclusionary rule does not explicitly "threat, enticement, deceit ’methods of collecting evidence should be excluded if, at the same time CPL and two high judicial interpretation has never been clearly defined" threat, enticement, deceit "approach meaning, thus to the substantive session of the enormous confusion. But confessions by "threat, enticement, deceit" method in the investigation practice, but it is a universal phenomenon, there is a reasonable explanation of the basis for its existence.This paper uses literature, summarizing the experience, theory and practice methods and other technical route. In literature reading research stage, collect and learn a lot of well-known domestic and foreign literature, the author’s own investigative experience, in the instructor’s help, first using value analysis of "threat, enticement, deceit," and reasonable pressure, a reasonable guide deception and legitimate distinction between a strict value, the second use of comparative law, which reveal our laws and criminal policies and international organizations and the world of laws and regulations, reasonable pressure on interrogation policy, a reasonable guide and lawful interrogation methods exist to deceive rationality based on final analysis using analytical methods used in the investigation practice reasonable pressure, guiding principles and legitimate deception reasonable interrogation tactics should be grasped and judicial practice to ensure a reasonable pressure, reasonable and lawful measures to guide deceive legitimate use of interrogation tactics, there help solve the serious problems of law and investigative practice disjointed.