On The Improvement Of The Quality Of Criminal Judicial Documents Under The Network Open System

According to the research of the contemporary law scholars, the establishment and implementation of the legal system is not only to make rules and regulations, the key lies in the final application of the law, how to combine the content of law and the development of modern times and specific cases, so as to make an accurate and reasonable judgment. The main characters of modern judicial activities are lawyers and judges. Therefore, it is very important to record and monitor the activities of the judges and the supervision and management of the basis of the judgment. As an important carrier of the judge’s role and the final decision of the judge, the judge should be strictly supervised and managed.The criminal judicial document is an important measure to examine the judicial power of criminal justice. It is one of the important ways of the modern judicial public and the judges and the people who have the knowledge of the case. At present, our country is vigorously promoting the public work of the referee instruments, and the quality of the referee instruments, especially the criminal judicial documents, put forward higher requirements. The author through the consult online open the criminal judicative paper found that there are still many defects, including admissible evidence in cases of reason is not sufficient proof, citing law does not regulate the argument is not careful, different co sentenced to criminal judgment, judgment documents public and personal privacy privacy of contradictions, and so many problems. These problems restrict the criminal judgment and role play, and can not fully reflect the judge’s own comprehensive quality, cause social public misunderstanding, and even affect the evaluation of criminal justice and fairness.In this paper, the network open criminal judgment as the research object to analysis, theoretical analysis combined with empirical analysis method, through analyzing the defects of criminal judgment, and combined with the Dezhou City Intermediate People’s court practice, on the basis of improving quality of China’s criminal court judgment documents from inside and outside two ways, through internal means to strengthen the criminal judgment according to the law on public business efforts, the collegial panel, the Committee of different opinions, the establishment of the case guidance system has China characteristics; external passing mainly improve the criminal judgment documents online system, strict protection of personal privacy, actively respond to criminal judgment caused by public opinion, through the internal and external way construction, in order to promote the production level of the future of China’s people’s Court of criminal judgment, better play the role of criminal judgment, will truly achieve the criminal judgment documents as the judge evaluation of comprehensive quality, guide the social concept of the rule of law, reflects the important basis for the judicial fairness and reflect.