Research On The Crime Of Intentionally Injuries

Intentional injury crime in the judicial practice is the most common of the crime, Because of the diversity and violence of the injury the severity of the damage, was considered a serious crime. In recent years, the situation of the emergence of multiple, the health of others caused serious harm, affecting the harmony and stability of the society. The violation of the right to life and health, is important rights enjoyed by every citizen, such fundamental rights if the violations or deprived, citizens enjoy the other rights it is difficult or unable to realize. Intentional injury has slight injury, minor injury two, minor injury, serious injury grade two, serious injury, death five results. The five results must be legally acquired forensic identification of the identification of persons in accordance with the statutory procedures to make identification, in order to become the public, seizure, law case based on the case. The of crime of intentional injury of common problems in the judicial practice and the human body injury degree of identification and the system of judicial identification research, I hope it can be helpful to the theory and judicial practice of the crime of intentional injury, which is conducive to the fight against the crime of intentional injury, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the masses of the people and social harmony and stability.This paper is divided into five parts except the introduction and the conclusion. In the judicial practice, the author studies the problem of intentional injury from different angles.The first part describes the concept and elements of intentional injury. In the second part, the comparative analysis of the crime of intentional injury and intentional homicide, the death of negligence, the crime of negligence caused serious injury. In the third part, the crime of intentional injury research into the crime of transformation. The fourth part combined with itself in reality, starting from January 2014 1, the formal implementation of the extent of damage to the "human body identification standards ", of intentional injury case, injury degree of human body, forensic identification are discussed. In the fifth part, the cases of intentional injury in the judicial practice of the new standards exist in the problem of their own recommendations.With the progress and development of society, our country will become a state of law, but the legal system in our country is still not perfect, there are still many cases of intentional injuries, or even some new crime of intentional injury, which would people’s lives and health and social security will cause a great threat. In judicial practice, the crime of intentional injury caused to the victim’s health what extent, it determines the behavior of people may be sentenced to what degree of punishment. That is, the legal sanction of human injury degree different actors who deliberately harm caused accepted is different. However, the results must be intentional injury after a forensic identification investigators can serve as the basis, and only after the forensic identification investigators to cases of intentional injury further processing according to expert opinion. Therefore, the degree of forensic identification of human injury is intentional injury cases handled and the conviction and sentencing of the perpetrators were the essential part.The innovation of this paper is combined with itself in the judicial identification of the actual work, of intentional injury case, injury degree of human body, forensic identification research and on the extent of damage to the human body identification in judicial practice in the existence of the problem put forward corresponding solutions and suggestions, to ensure that the forensic experts in the identification of injury, make scientific, objective, fair, accurate and expert opinion, in order to "public, prosecutors, and other judicial organs of intentional injury case correctly handle, reduce or avoid the occurrence of injustice and misjudged cases.