| By China since ancient times "men marry women marry" the influence of the marriage customs, still exist in our country generally maintained the man buy houses ancient customs. Nowadays with the rapid development of market economy, house prices are soaring in growth, and the divorce rate is in a straight line up, real estate, the great value of its ownership problems become the focus of debate in academic, public opinion, and paid for by parents for their children to buy the more the phenomenon of "Chinese characteristics", the problem caused by property ownership has become people to be clear in real life problems. In August 2011 of the marriage law judicial interpretation (3), basic property law in accordance with the rules set the terms and conditions, the reality in the marriage of the provisions of the uniform handling of several kind of problem, parents after marriage is contributive to purchase property ownership problems in the real operation laws. But the marriage law judicial interpretation (3) with our country "marriage law" the regulation of the couple’s property system, the "marriage law judicial interpretation (2)" the relevant provisions. At the same time it also did not fully consider the particularity of marriage and its important role in social stability.According to the above situation, this article from the perspective of real life, to the "marriage law judicial interpretation (3)" article 7 as the research background, from the perspective of executive party parents after marriage contributive buy property the situation is analyzed, and corresponding advice is given. First of all, the first part of this article to contributive buy property the side parents after marriage with "Chinese characteristics" phenomenon from the Angle of characteristics, types and related laws and regulations for a more comprehensive analysis. Second, this article second part parents contributive buy property ownership on the part of the marriage problems of related regulations, the "marriage law judicial interpretation (3) of article 7 of the rationality is analyzed from the aspects of practicality. Once again, this article third part to the buy side parents after marriage property ownership rules, namely the "marriage law judicial interpretation (3) of article 7 in the real life of the unreasonable place from the lack of protection of the rights and interests of women, not affinity particularity, and our current" marriage law "and relevant judicial interpretation runs counter to the spirit, and do not tally with the reality of marriage customs in China family four angles. In the end, in the fourth part of this article in view of the contributive buy property belonging to a party parents after marriage problems existing shortcomings of corresponding Suggestions are given, that is to strengthen the protection of women vulnerable groups in marriage, give full consideration to the particularity of affinity, to strengthen the relationship between "marriage law" and relevant judicial interpretations, thoroughly from four aspects such as the family and marriage customs in China. |