Shareholders’ Right To Know The Practice Problem Analysis

The shareholders’ right to know, as the basis for the exercise of other rights, is not simply related to the interests of shareholders, but the key to the development of the Surety Company. However, to the shareholders’ right to know the relevant legislation, China has made remarkable progress, but the relevant laws and regulations are still too simple, not a complete system. In the judicial practice, there are some cases about the right to know about the shareholder’s right to know, the judge has no uniform standard in the application of law, which leads to many similar cases. In this paper, Li Moumou other four real estate development Co. v. Jiangsu Jiade company shareholders the right to know.The case as being the basis, the related system in our country the shareholder’s right to know and discusses a straightforward analysis.The thesis consists of four parts : introduction, body, conclusion and postscript.In the introduction the author summarizes the main topics of background, meaning and purpose of writing.The first chapter of this paper mainly introduces the case, analyzes the first instance and the second instance verdict, and the reasons, and finally summarizes the three issues of the case.In the second chapter, the article focuses on the first issue of the case, pure procedure of the shareholders’ right to know, talking the purpose and the nature of the establishment of the legislation. Chapter third of shareholders apply to the company have "legitimate purpose" for clues, from three parts were discussed, namely the shareholders exercise their right to know "legitimate purpose" meaning, the need for legislation to establish "legitimate purpose"; being identified "legitimate aim" and proof of assignment of responsibility. In the fourth chapter the author introduces and outlines the right to know the scope of identification, followed by analysis and discussion of the core issues of this chapter- "accounting books" and finally return to this article particular case, the Court of Review judgment, and put forward their views and summary.