The Public Use Of Land Expropriation In The United States

In the process of our human life, plays a crucial role in the public interest, is closely connected with our life. And for the interests of the public records can be traced back to BC, at the time of ancient Greece had started to study on the public interests. Now almost every countries and regions in the world of public interest has set forth the relevant system. Our country is not exceptional also, open the letter of the law of our country, we find the figure of public interests, thus, the word has become the important existence in our legal system, however, between the word itself on the concept of fuzziness and uncertainty on the existing state of all kinds of factors, leading to the grasp of the concept of public interests, and how the public interest to better define these problems become a realistic problem in the process of our legal system construction, especially in our existing conditions, exactly which model of public interest is more suitable for China? Which subject to define the better? How to control the public interests on the program? These are scholars research the problem, as a result, in this paper, the applicable conditions of public use in the United States, through three classic case analysis of the evolution of concept of public use in the United States, the contrast of the differences and similarities between China and the United States, to public interest in China’s legislative and judicial aspects of the definition and applicable Suggestions to consummate the suggestion.This article mainly divided into five parts, the first part is from the basic theory of public interest, a brief introduction to the basic concept of public interest and for the advance of the theory and the present domestic and foreign scholars point of view of the mainstream status. The second part mainly through the three classic case introduction, comparison and analysis the public use by changes in the narrow sense to a broad in the United States. The third part is through the comparison with the United States, find out the similarities and differences of the two countries, so as to give the public interest in the perfection of legislation in our country. The fourth part from the Angle of the program to control the public interest, the last part is from the judicial aspects of public interest regulation. Through the contrast and analysis system of the two countries, the author hopes to the construction and improvement of the public interests of our country put forward some useful opinions and Suggestions, in order to promote the development of public interests, perfect the legal system construction of the country.