Study On The Difficult Problems Of Law In The Case Of Theft Of Criminal Cases

When found in multiple theft, they should have received administrative penalties or criminal penalties for theft and has not been given administrative punishment or criminal penalties for theft along with the inclusion of multiple theft identification range. For carrying weapon range weapon identified in theft, theft criminals can not carry lethal devices are identified as the murder weapon, can not be too narrow down its scope, will carry the weapon in weapon identification theft is equivalent to the leth al weapons in the weapon It identified. Only theft carried by the instrument and the specific case combined analysis instruments and theft perpetrator carried, whether there is an association between theft target. If there is association, the perpetrator no subjective awareness of people use the weapon, then this time the instrument can not be identified as the murder weapon. If the device is theft and theft carried by people,there is no any connection between the theft target, it proves that there is no theft achievements of people intent on using the weapon of the perpetrator subjective, and that this time, the portable device can be identified for the weapon. Only in this way can the weapon to make an accurate and objective identification.Should pick-pocketing objects- carry belongings limited to the range of goods and personal items close,close to where the article does not require the victim actually dominate and control can.Burglary, carrying weapons theft, pick-pocketing exists attempted state, and when the attempted theft in a stopped state. The case only in connection with specific cases and the severity, in line with 2013 interpretation,they should be held criminally responsible.