An Influence Analysis Of Nian Bin Case From The “We-media”to “Giant Event”

Nian Bin case was sentenced to death four times but eventually acquitted the defendant was regarded as the extreme cases, the significance of Nian bin case having a benchmark in our judicial process, so the case was selected as one of China’s top ten media impact litigation in the 2014, this case can be referred to the criminal justice and even the Chinese judicial practice of contemporary China "giant event." The traditional media pay close attention to the Nian Bin case, “we-media” as one of the new media pay even more attention to the case. Nian bin is the lucky ones under the reform environment, during the trial, the Supreme People’s Court has take back the death penalty of re-check reexamine rights(2007), "rules of evidence" have clearly issuesed the rules of illegal evidence exclusion(2010), as well as expert advisor system was introduced, The promulgation and implementation of the above-described system of criminal is promoting the justice reform process and pace. By comparing the influence of traditional media and “we-media” from Bin cases influence the trial process of information dissemination can be found in the environment of the current criminal justice reform, from the media fast, timely and comprehensive information to pass major cases there are aspects of traditional media incomparable Advantage.The text of this paper is divided into three parts, the first part compared the two types of media, from the “we-media” and official media extract data,at the same time using the matlab program, analysis before and after the Nian Bin case,it acquitted two categories from the media Nian Bin case information dissemination and their mutual differences. During the second part of the study of criminal justice reform, Traditional media concerned the Nian Bin case, during the trial of the Nian Bin case the Supreme People’s Court taken back to the death penalty re-check rights,and issues the introduction of illegal evidence and rules of evidence in death penalty cases, the modified "rules of Criminal Procedure," set the specialist expert determination witness system regime. During the period of judgment, traditional media interviews Nian Jian Lan and Zhang Yan Sheng, the relevant comments related to judicial reform. The third part, I believe that the idea is Nian Bin benefitedfrom the joint effect of several factors, In other words, individual sound from the“we-media” and lawyers make a sound, traditional media is a high-power amplifier,but Nian Bin was released the finally benefited from judicial reform’s favorable opportunity. End of the article, the author make a conclusion, Nian Bin case from the“we-media” to take stock of the influence. In a typical case of Nian Bin, because the trials results was related to Nian Bin relatives and friends, the entire defense team use from the “we-media”, the timely issue of information, but from the “we-media”platform’s influence is limited, so Nian Bin’s parties are more willing to timely use its upgraded version of the traditional media, “we-media” and traditional media, the official media aim at the case of evidently issues, and good at grasp Categories criminal justice reform, to promote criminal justice reform process do some foreshadowing of public opinion.