The Improvement Of The Theory Of The Death Penalty Review Procedure In Our Country

The supreme people’s court and higher people’s court is responsible for executing death penalty review procedure(the court responsible for the immediate execution of a death penalty review; provincial high court review) is responsible for the death penalty with suspension of two years. However, with the death penalty review into a development, trial in 2007, the supreme people’s court to exercise the right of death penalty review concerned unity, after the immediate execution of a death penalty judgment rate of our country in 10 years offer the continuous decline of parabola, means the judgment of the supreme people’s court for execution immediately rate significantly decreased, second, the death penalty review procedure is more strict led to significant improvements in the quality of case, wrong case rate is reduced, at the beginning of 2013, the supreme people’s court has charged in the death penalty review procedure of lianyungang city people’s procuratorate Tang Dingli drug trafficking case in death penalty cases made the decision of the death penalty shall not be approved, and cancel the original judgment, the retrial; In 2012, the supreme people’s court in the death penalty review procedure to cancel the chuzhou then about ChanYongZhong, ChanYongChun about the immediate execution of a death penalty judgment, visible, the death penalty review procedure to save lives, protect the innocent from being wrong, is very big, the two cases and other case of disapproval, is the Supreme Court through comprehensive and careful review of death penalty cases, the conclusion after the screening. But, in contrast, the program \ "tightening\" the implementation of the process, sometimes it will appear the phenomenon of \ "failure\", not able to give full play to its in death penalty cases of criminal litigation supervision and the role of the \ "last line of insurance\".