Responsible For Administrative Research Appear In Court System

The paper analyzes the litigation system of administrator to appear in court from the practicality and maneuverability, in the perspective of administration executive to appear in court litigation, and then finds out the institutional shortcomings from the theoretical level, hoping to be able to put forward the improvement scheme; In addition, analyzes the status of the system from the judiciary and practice, and then discusses the effective operation guarantee mechanism of the system of administrator to appear in court to find a new route for the operation of the litigation system of the administrator to appear in court in China and to promote the open cooperative administrative trial mode.The first part introduces an overview of the litigation system of administrator to appear in court including of its connotation and its value connotation and my understanding of it.The second part expounds the generation and development and the current situation and the specific provision in the legislation of our country one by one.The third part briefly analyzes and discusses the problems and reasons existed in the judicial practice about the litigation system of administrator to appear in court in our country including of the problems existed in the contents of local text norms, and the discrepancies of administrative leaders appeared in court between different regions and different administrative organizations and the stability of the litigation rates of the administrator to appear in court, and the phenomenon of administrator to appear in court but not do what he should do and the effects of the system designed to play and the reasons caused the problems above in order to help the development and implementation of the litigation system of administrator to appear in court in our country in the system and practice.The fourth part discusses the system conception about perfecting our country’s responses to administrative trial responsibility on the basis of the discusses of thethird part of the paper, and analyzes the conception about perfecting the system one by one separately from the legislative level and judicial level and external supervision of judicial level.