The Impact Of High School Chemistry Classroom Immediate Evaluation And Student Participation

There is a close relationship among Classroom Evaluation, School Teaching and Student Learning, the Immediate evaluation of Classroom as an internal evaluation of classroom, it plays an important role in education and teaching. However, in the educational research community and classroom teachers teaching work, it did not cause widespread attention.Student participation in the teaching process status is an important factor affecting student academic achievement. It is also an important factor in the field of educational research, the study of the impact of both the students involved in the teaching process has practical significance, but also has the theoretical value.Studies have found that teaching is one of the factors affecting student participation, In this study, the behavior of high school chemistry teacher teaching-immediate evaluation of classroom as a starting point to study its impact on student participation. Research questions including:(1) What is the content and structural elements of high school chemistry classroom immediate evaluation?(2) What is the content and structural elements of high school student participation in the teaching process?(3) What is the situation of high school chemistry class immediate evaluation? How about the difference of demographic background factors?(4) What is the situation of high school student participation in the teaching process? How about the difference of demographic background factors?(5) What is the relationship among each dimension of class immediate evaluation?(6) What is the relationship among each dimension of student participation?(7) What is the impact of immediate classroom evaluation and student participation?This research paper consists of six parts. Part Ⅰ is introduction. It mainly explained research questions explained, meaning, ideas and methods. Part Ⅱ is the literature review, interpreted the core concepts of "immediate evaluation of classroom","student participation" and so on. Then comprehensive review of the research-related domestic and foreign research. Part Ⅲ is the questionnaire preparation and implementation of this study will be described below, and presents the revised terms of quality indicators from the survey questionnaire reliability, item discrimination, exploratory factor analysis. Part V analyzed the situation of the high school chemistry class immediate evaluation. By AMOS17.0constructing models, testing hypotheses, at last, testing the difference of demographic background factors. The fifth part described situation of student participation from three dimensions:behavioral, cognitive and emotional participation, explaining the relationship among three dimensions, and then testing the difference of demographic background factors. Part VI, firstly, analyzed the correlation among various dimensions of classroom immediate evaluation and student participation, then testing the specific impact of the situation by the regression model. Part VII, described the research findings, inspiration, innovation and the shortage.Conclusions of this study are as follows:1. In this study, the designed immediate evaluation questionnaire involves four-level indicators, totally has18questions. The questionnaire of student participation consist of27questions, Involves three first indicators and nine second indicators. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire are good.2.Poor high school chemistry class immediate evaluation of the status quo:based teacher evaluation, emphasis on content knowledge assessment dimensions, the use of non-verbal evaluation methods less positive evaluation of performance is not obvious. There is a correlation among the immediate evaluation subject,content, methods and performance, evaluation of the subject, content and manner as the independent variables affect the performance evaluation. The test results of demographic background factors show that:different schools, grades and class differences in the evaluation of students in immediate evaluation scores.3.There is a uneven development among behavior, cognition and emotion participation, the best level of development is behavior participation, then the emotional participation, the lowest level is cognitive engagement. There is a correlation among the three different participations, correlation between cognitive and emotional participation is greater. Different gender, school, grade and class of students there are differences in the level of participation.4.Four dimensions of high school chemistry class has an impact on the immediate assessment of student participation in three dimensions, between any two significant positive correlation. Regression analysis showed that, demographic variables on the dependent variable has2.5%of the students participating in the explanatory power, gender group reached a significant leve. In the case of controlling demographic background factors, immediate evaluation of classroom predict significant student participation can bring explanatory power of17.3%. Greater impact where assessment and evaluation of the effectiveness of the body involved in a greater impact on the behavior of a larger evaluation methods and evaluation of the effectiveness of the emotional impact on participation, awareness and participation in the evaluation by the evaluation of the main ways. This study is to deepen the impact of teaching students to participate in the study provides a guideline, specific to the classroom for students to participate in real-time evaluation of the impact of the various dimensions of the situation. Research tools and methods need further improvement...