Comparative Study Of The 28th Men’s Basketball Championships Top Six Teams Offensive And Defensive Capabilities Of The Guards

Defender important as a team organizer and leader, its position and role of self-evident.28th Men’s Basketball Championships China men’s basketball team scored nine-game winning streak and won one fell swoop with the Guards inseparable outstanding performance, the Chinese team’s weakness has improved, but also exposed the Chinese and other Asian team defender Elite Guard presence deficiencies. Therefore, this paper based on Chinese Guards at the 28th Men’s Basketball Championships performance by the performance of the offensive and defensive capabilities of the top six teams in each of the outstanding Guards were analyzed and compared in order to obtain the corresponding results of the comparison, find the Asian teams gaps between the guard and propose effective recommendations for China Basketball guards in the future to provide valuable training and competition. In this paper, literature, video observation research methods, mathematical statistics and logical analysis, the 28th Men’s Basketball Championships top six teams Guards offensive and defensive capabilities in technical indicators for statistical analysis, results were as follows:1、Chinese and Lebanese defender obvious height advantage, age is small, Japan and South Korea defender contrast, the Philippines and Iran back to center. Meanwhile, the Philippines, Japan and Lebanon guard better than China, Iran and South Korea in weight and body guard on the degree of enrichment.2、Japan and Lebanon guard than the other four teams scoring guard high efficiency, wherein the strong long-range shooting ability Lebanon and the Philippines, South Korea and Japan in the distance shooting ability, strong ability of China and Iran, shot at close range;3、South Korea defender assists ability, outstanding fast break, fast break to dribble mainly; Lebanon and China defender Secondly, the short pass fast-break oriented; Japan, the Philippines and Iran’s poor performance.4、Philippines, Japan, Lebanon and shooting guard flexible way, China, South Korea and Iran to use shooting guard to be relatively simple, are the main driving layup.5、South Korea, China, Japan, Lebanon and guard more turnovers, including South Korea, Lebanon and China to pass the ball back errors mainly Japanese defender to break through the main mistakes; Chinese and Lebanese defender made a strong foul ability to dribble foul mainly Korea and Iran a strong defensive foul guard control capability.6, China, the Philippines and Japan fighting for offensive guard and defensive rebounds outstanding performance, capacity leveling, Iran defender to scramble for an offensive rebound mainly poor defensive rebounding, Lebanon guard in both the technical performance of the center, whether it is South Korea defender offensive rebounds or defensive rebounding behind the opponent, the worst performance.7、Lebanon and the Philippines back cover outstanding ability, China and Japan, followed by guards, Iran and South Korea defender worst; the Philippines ability to steal back the best performance, followed by Lebanon and South Korea defender, China, Iran and Japan defender poor performance8、China and the Philippines back on the individual game outstanding efficiency, but there is a clear gap between the guard squad; Lebanon and Japan defender higher overall comprehensive strength, balance performance; Korea and Iran, the worst defender.