Font Size: a A A

Experimental Research And Process Simulation Of Natural Gas Hydrate Replacement Production By Injecting CO2+N2 Mixture Gas

Posted on:2018-04-30Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2321330533967038Subject:Energy and Chemical Engineering
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Natural gas could be produced by CO2 replacement method from natural gas hydrate reservoirs and CO2 is sequestered simultaneously.The formation of CO2 hydrate plays an important role in stabilizing reservoir,which could avoid slope failure and seabed ecosystem destruction during replacement process.However,the replacement method is restricted by the source of CO2.Although flue gas from power plant is employed to reduce purification cost of CO2,the concentration of CO2 is less than 20% which confined the production of natural gas.To overcome this problem,a natural gas hydrate production method is proposed by injecting rich CO2 gas?CO2 + N2 mixture gas?obtained by flue gas hydrate separation in this workIn this paper,ice powder and methane in the quartz sand system was used to simulate hydrate reservoir.The experiment was conducted to simulate the replacement process of the methane production from methane hydrate by injecting CO2 at the temperature of 18? and the pressure of 2.13.4 MPa and by injecting 53%CO2 + 47%N2 mixture gas at the temperature of 114? and the pressure of 6.514 MPa.The replacement processes were compared respectively by injecting CO2,53%CO2 + 47%N2 mixture gas and flue gas with CO2 partial pressure of 3.4 MPa and replacement temperature of 1?.The mechanism of decomposition-diffusion was proposed that CH4 was produced by injecting CO2 + N2 mixture gas from hydrate reservoir.At the end of this paper,energy efficiency of two schemes,flue gas-replacement production-membrane separation and flue gas-hydrate separation-replacement production-membrane separation,were used to simulate and be compared by Aspen software.The experimental results of replacement process showed that the recovery ratio and the concentration of methane in the gas phase increased with replacement temperature rising,no matter what CO2 or 53%CO2 + 47%N2 was injected.The best performance of CO2 replacement was 46.6% of CH4 recovery ration and 0.13 of CH4 concentration after about 142 h at 8?.For 53%CO2 + 47%N2 mixture gas replacement process,the best performance was conducted at 14? in the range of experimental temperature.97.0% of CH4 recovery ratio and0.15 of CH4 concentration were obtained after about 66 h.The concentration of methane in the gas phase reduced significantly with pressure increasing by injecting CO2 or 53%CO2 +47%N2 mixture gas within the examined pressure range.During the process of CO2 replacement,the CH4 recovery ration was rising with pressure increase.While the CH4 recovery ration was decreasing with pressure increase during the process of 53%CO2 +47%N2 mixture gas replacement.When the injection pressure of CO2 increased from 2.1 MPa to 3.4 MPa,the CH4 recovery ration rose from 12.6% to 19.0% and the CH4 concentration in the gas phase decreased from 0.14 to 0.06.When the injection pressure of 53%CO2 + 47%N2mixture gas increased from 6.5 MPa to 13.8 MPa,the CH4 recovery ration drop from 17.0%to 6.3% and the CH4 concentration in the gas phase decreased from 0.07 to 0.01.The ranking performance of replacement with CO2 partial pressure of 3.4 MPa at 1? was: injecting CO2 >injecting 53%CO2 + 47%N2 > injecting 19%CO2 + 81%N2.Aspen simulation results showed that the energy efficiency of scheme two was higher than the energy efficiency of scheme one when the injection pressure was 310 MPa.The energy efficiency of scheme two and scheme one was almost equal when the injection pressure was 1016 MPa.
Keywords/Search Tags:natural gas hydrate, replacement exploitation, CH4, CO2, Aspen simulation, energy efficiency
PDF Full Text Request
Related items