| Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival rate of the implants and the peri-implant tissue changes between immediate implant and delayed implant.Methods: A systematic search was conducted by two reviewers independently in the databases PubEmbase,Cochrane Library,Wangfang,VIP and CNKI databases using diffeMed/MEDLINE,rent search terms;articles about randomized controlled trials(RCTs)published from January 2008 to March 2018 were searched for.Results: The searches identified 15 eligible studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.A total of 1,105 implants were installed in a total of 912 patients with a mean age of 45.2 years and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up.The survival rate of delayed implants(97.9%)was not significantly greater than immediate implants(94.7%)[RR=1.64,95%CI(0.95-2.83)P=0.07].For the marginal bone loss(P=0.39),and pocket probing depth(P=0.36),there was no significant difference between the analysed groups.Conclusion:The immediate implant of a single tooth had similar implant survival,marginal boneloss and pocket probing depth with delayed implant of a single tooth. |
PDF Full Text Request