Jurisprudence Analysis Of A Typical Form Of Injustice

In this paper, the recent criminal injustice for the study, by examining the impact of recent large criminal injustice because injustice from happening to explore the level of jurisprudence, from multiple perspectives to analyze the formation mechanism of injustice, comply fully eighth Fourth Plenary proposed the rule of law, rule of law in China of the times, the real implementation of "let every judicial case can feel justice" justice objectives Xi Jinping General secretary. By analyzing the typical injustice, injustice occurs summed criminal law, put forward the idea of justice, to further implement the principle of independence of the judiciary to exercise, to strengthen judicial protection of human rights performance. This article includes a total of four chapters:The first chapter is an introduction. The main causes of proposed research injustice, injustice research status at home and abroad, meaning injustice research, and the research method used.The second chapter is the empirical study typical injustice. First, the concept of injustice, and injustice and to distinguish other concepts put forward the concept of a typical injustice. Secondly, the case selection criteria injustice. Finally, the chart listed ten typical from injustice, and summed up their common law.The third chapter jurisprudence Typical Unjust Cause analysis, sociology major use of law, law school norms, three perspectives of economics and the following three methods to explore the profound social background typical criminal injustice occurs, system defects, failure mechanisms, etc. the reason.The fourth chapter is typical curb injustice jurisprudence recommendations. Above corresponds, from the perspective of sociology of law, law point of view and an economic point of law norms that how our country correlation system from multiple perspectives, in order to prevent and promptly correct the criminal injustice.