Researching On Current Situation And Problems Of Open Justice System

In the frenzy of big data, the judicial reform of our country is in the information technology era. The system of judicial open as an important measure to deepen the contemporary judicial reform in our country, is an important way of information dissemination of justice. The system of judicial open which has procedural justice values and instrumental values, can effectively protect the interests of justice which involving the public participation and supervision in the judicial,and the use of big data alleviates the lack of own resources and the limited judicial malpractice way approach, making the accelerated development of justice open, but at the same time, The system of judicial open still exists the excessive fragmentation of judicial public documents, the principle of justice open scope and the slowly updated of open manner question and so on. By the judicial practice of public research, data analysis, comparison between the courts can effectively promote justice open process, improving the open system of justice. Article text is divided into four parts:The first part is an overview of the judicial public, including the judiciary public meaning, subject, object, meaning. As one of the measures to deepen the reform of the judiciary, judicial and public in general government public information and other administrative information disclosure there are many different, but by the meaning of open justice, object, subject, explain the meaning of the relevant legal study to better understand and analyze the intrinsic value of open justice. Justice and public relations research is useful for analyzing the significance of open justice, how to protect the public from judicial justice from justice; how can we form and in substantially consistent with the disclosure requirements of justice, so as to maintain the target value of justice.The second part is disclosed in our judicial history, current situation and practice impede research. Analysis of data from the judicial practice open to the resulting analysis can be more thorough, deeper draw disclosed in our judicial practice of the various regions of the country, one can learn from the experience of advanced countries of the judiciary and the work of the NPC report; on the other hand can be reached by public data transparency, facilitate supervision by the masses results.The third part is a comparative study of the court in Shenzhen and Hong Kong public situation. Any establishment after generating system are bound to have other examples for their information and learn, and to carry out research in our open system of justice is bound to have many places in the judicial system will learn more advanced areas. Hong Kong, as the representative of the advanced judicial system, next to the mainland Shenzhen this judicial system reform pilot city, even impossible to completely copy, but Hong Kong's legal system is disclosed is worth learning from mainland courts place indeed.The fourth part of the problem, and I imagine our judicial system is disclosed for the development of open justice. This section from the public and the public's right to know justice, judicial openness and privacy protection aspects were discussed, justice and public interests of the public and the parties to the case closely, must proceed from the interests of the balance of considerations, to safeguard the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people, and make sure open justice for the people. After the development of open justice and also improve them, a comprehensive study of the preceding section, the author mainly from the legislative scope of the disclosure, and other publicly available on the current situation of open justice to perfect vision.