Review Of The Deficiency And Perfection On The Evidence In The Prosecution Stage Of Criminal Cases

In recent years, a series of wrongly-charged cases such as rape and killing in Inner Mongolia, Xu Jinlin’s robbery and theft, She Xianglin’s killing of his wife, Wang Shuhong’s rape and killing, Chen Guoming’s robbery in chengde, Hebei, Li Jiuming’s killing, Qin Yanhong’s rape in Anyang, Henan occur frequently. All these pose unprecedented challenges to the credibility of justice and law in our country.Wrongly-charged cases are not only exist in China, scholars home and abroad have studyied deeply about how to prevent it from happening again. The research achievements of these scholars inspire and help me a lot. The writer thinks that the reason for most wrongly-charged criminal cases lies in the failure of examing the evidence in prosecution stage. The writer tries to combine practice work with the research on the improvement of examing the evidence in prosecution stage, hoping to protect the legitimate rights and interests of criminal litigant participant, reduce the wrongs, help maintain the credibility of justice and law.The writer in this article combines the related concepts and theories with the practical prosecution work to analyses the cause and shortage in examination and prosecution stage in China. Through summarizing, the writer puts up suggestions and plans to the improvement on examing evidence on prosecution stage so as to improve the quality of the evidence review in criminal cases, effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of criminal proceedings, reduce the wrongs to greater extent, safeguard judicial credibility.