Expert Auxiliary System Research In Civil Litigation

With the development of economic society,there are all kinds of contradictions appears gradually,especially the specialty problems in the field of Civil and Commercial Suit.Before,once facing such situation,the judges have to give it to the identification agency,and sentence the suit according the identification.However,they can't grasp the focus of expert advisor's identification completely in the practice judiciary in usual,which leads higher repeated--identification rate,and litigation cost increased.Or the identification of expert advisor isn't more authoritative then others when refer to some specialty problems in some civil cases,and some specialty problems even never belong to the scope of identification,or court adopted the opinions of expert advisors blindly or the party don't know very well about opinions of expert advisors and specialty problems in the case,it influences to utilize their right totally at put to the proof and cross-examination.Therefore,to make sure the parties would maintain their right fully and the judge perform their trial rightly,our country's active?Civil Procedure Law?absorbed the regulation of article 61 in?Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on evidence in Civil Proceedings?,which generate expert auxiliary system.As a procedure system,expert advisor system in civil suit in our country just has rudiment,due to short of the rule at expert advisor's statute of a subject?litigation status?right?obligation?opinion-effectiveness and the detail procedure starting up expert advisor system.The text aim at clear fundamental frame by the methods of comparison,reference and so on,to improve the problem the judges met in juridical practice in our country's expert auxiliary system in civil litigation.