On The Validity Of The Equity Repurchase Clause In The Capital Increase Agreement

With the development of economy,China's capital market has become increasingly active.All kinds of market players or in order to expand market share;or for the company's financial needs,such as mergers and acquisitions,restructuring,listing and other widely used.The gambling agreement as an investor and the financing side of the enterprise valuation of the future uncertainty of an adjustment agreement has a broad application prospects in the operation of the relevant capital.In the judicial practice,the controversy surrounding the gambling agreement has never stopped.This article through the narrative A investment funds and B Group,C Company,D Company,E shareholder shareholders to buy back the case of disputes,and the relevant theory of the case involved in the controversial focus of the analysis.The first part is mainly to state the basic case,and put forward the focus of the case controversy.The second part focuses on the focus of this case.First of all,with the relevant theory and the actual situation of the case to confirm the "replenishment of the Supplementary Agreement" in the equity repurchase terms for the gambling agreement.Secondly,it analyzes the validity of the equity repurchase clause in the capital increase agreement.The third part puts forward some suggestions on the application of gambling agreement in our country.