Research On The Pretrial Conference Improvement Under The Substantive Trial

The "Criminal Procedure Law" of 2012 established pretrial conference to improve the efficiency of litigation,to maintain the trial focused on the trial is of great significance.Because the Pretrial Conference is an effective link between pretrial procedures and court proceedings,it is necessary to integrate the concept of substantive trial into the pretrial conference as a transitional procedure for the trial of the court.In this paper,we use the comparative research method,through the study of the British defense to guide the hearing and preparation of the hearing procedures,the United States before the court meeting system,the French criminal pretrial procedure,the German intermediate procedures,analysis of advantages and disadvantages,summed up the meeting Revelation,focus on improving the pretrial conference system.The thesis consists of four parts.The first part introduces the pretrial conference system from the perspective of substantive trial,and analyzes the meaning of the trial and the content of the trial,and leads to the discussion of the scope and effectiveness of the court meeting.The second part,through the analysis of foreign related systems,according to the relevant revelation of the follow-up system to improve the bedding.The third part leads to the problems existing in the application process of our country before the meeting,the information integration and the collocation of the collocation function is ambiguous,the defendant's participation right is uncertain,the presiding prescription of the pretrial conference is clear and the court meeting is not clear.The fourth part,through the analysis of relevant issues,put forward perfect suggestions,clear the function of the pretrial conference,determine the subject of the pretrial conference,standardize the formation and effectiveness of the results and the rights of the objection.