Research On The Rule Of Reaching A Conclusion With The Indirect Evidence In The Criminal Litigation

In Britain and the United States and other western developed countries,evidence theory system in our country is relatively backward,especially embodied in the indirect evidence.Indirect evidence of pace probably can be divided into three stages,namely "completely ruled out the use period-but restrict the use of period-widely used period",Combined with the situation in our country,the indirect evidence theory research is not enough thorough,the practical applications of indirect evidence independent finalized and Anglo-American countries widely.Plus oral confession the complex dependencies,interactive mode of proof in our country,The article is divided into four parts.The first part,question raises.Combined with history and reflect on it,which lead to topic for discussion,simple and expounded the value and significance of research on indirect evidence.The second part,function and independence.Indirect evidence theory was introduced in detail the connotation of the extension classification factors,such as making indirect evidence theory itself has a clear understanding and understanding,at the same time,tells the story of the indirect evidence to the direct evidence to confirm to repair the use of the function and independent finalized rules,and expounds the significance and role.The third part,the difficulties and countermeasures.Demonstrates in detail the plight of the indirect evidence finalized at this stage,aimed at the status for coping with the train of thought,specific finalize it includes changing ideas,abandon the confession complex,prove standard,etc.This is a key section.The fifth part,the conclusion.