Since the conclusion of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights(TRIPS),developed countries have been dissatisfied with the status quo of international intellectual property protection,particularly in the developing countries,and at the same time as the law enforcement nitpicked,intellectual property protection high standard in WTO and re negotiations under the framework of WIPO is hindered and low efficiency,so the developed countries began to jump out of the new treaty multilateral system in the complex boundary system,the "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement"(ACTA)and the "Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement"(TPP)is in this context to achieve.ACTA and TPP represent the high standards of international intellectual property protection,with particular emphasis on the regulation of law enforcement measures,law enforcement efforts higher than the TRIPS agreement,is a typical "TRIPS-plus" agreement,and therefore continue to be attacked by developing countries.This "regime shifting" approach in developed countries has resulted in the weakening of the multilateral system and the consequences of the shift of the focus of international IP protection,while also posing a serious impact on developing countries,so developing countries headed by China should strive to the issue of intellectual property protection under the multilateral system,reaffirmed the need to follow the minimum standards of the TRIPS Agreement rather than simply raising the level of protection,and should join forces with other forces against new offensive and demand protection of traditional resources to improve the right to speak.Based on the comparative study,this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between TRIPS Agreement and ACTA,TPP,especially the performance of TPP for the inheritance and development of the former two,which shows that the developed countries use TPP to improve their competitiveness in the new global trend,the interests of interest groups to protect the interests of the public interest.The paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter is the international intellectual property law enforcement overview,leads to the concept of international intellectual property law enforcement,and TRIPS agreement as the boundary of the former TRIPS agreement on the international intellectual property law enforcement and TRIPS agreement enforcement rules,-plus agreement,and a brief description of the "institutional transfer" of the incentives and results.The second to the fifth chapters analyze the civil and administrative procedures and remedial measures of the TPP,the border measures,the criminal enforcement measures and the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the digital environment.When analyzing the specific measures,compare the high and unbalanced standard of law enforcement measures for TPP in terms of scope of application,law enforcement object,type of punishment and multi-latitude of rights protection.The sixth chapter mainly elaborates the further weakening of the multilateral system of international intellectual property protection by TPP and the impact of the shift of protection and the impact on the developing countries.Finally,it analyzes the impact of TPP on China and puts forward the countermeasures of China. |