The Status Quo Of The Court Trial And The Exploration Of The Perfect Path

In recent years,with more complete regulations and more rapid development of network technology,judicial publicity is becoming increasingly transparent.From December 2016,China Court Trial Publicity website has been opened and accessible,which labels that judicial publicity is now in a higher level.The improvement and development of live streaming of court trial will help eliminate publics' untrusty and doubt towards judicial activities,will also facilitate the judicial fairness and build judicial authority.The live streaming of court trial as the major type of judicial publicity,however,has its shortcomings.This article will start from the China Court Trial Publicity website to analyze the significance of judicial publicity and its potential negative influence.Additionally,the progress and current problems of court trial publicity is discussed in detail,also the difference of court trial publicity between China and foreign countries is compared.Furthermore,suggestions are proposed in this paper.Detail as followings: Chapter 1 Introduction.This chapter discussed the background,significance and current research result.Chapter 2 The Significance of Court Trial Publicity.The positive significance of court trial publicity are discussed from different perspectives.Court trial publicity ensures the way that publics perform their right of auditing law cases,which is an important part of judicial publicity,helps achieve procedural justice,helps improve judicial credibility,and contributes to popularizing law knowledge in publics.Chapter 3 The current progress of Court Trial Publicity in China.This chapter analyzed the current progress of court trial publicity.The progress is reflected by the improvement and completion of regulations,increasingly strengthened publicity,increased publicity level and the diverse methods of publicity.Chapter 4 The existing problems of Court Trial Publicity in China.This chapter analyzed the existing problems of court trial publicity.Including the equipment of live streaming is not sufficient,the quality of live streaming is waiting for improvement,the normalization of court trial is still low,and the difference between demand and supply of court trial exists,also the potential negative sides of court trial publicity..Chapter 5 Comparison of Court Trial Publicity between China and Foreign Countries.The current situation of court trial publicity in United States of America,United Kingdom,Canada and other countries or regions is discussed in detail.Chapter 6 Improvement Methods and Suggestion.Thoughts and recommendations are proposed in this chapter.For instance,the publicity mechanism aiming at satisfying the public demand should be established.The uniform rules of live streaming of court trial should be set up.The equipment and technology of live streaming of court trial should be improved.The security of court trial publicity should be further strengthened.Also the mechanism of explanation and dealing with public opinion should be built.