A Comparative Study Of The Offensive Ability Of The Chinese Team's Guards In The 26th Asian Basketball Championships

With modern competitive level of basketball continues to improve, the offensive and defensive basketball game faster and faster conversion basketball competitive, ornamental and confrontational gradually increased by the masses love. Chinese team post players best players together, but has been the lack of good Guards, guard is the player most of the time the ball field, basketball game organizer, is the initiator of the attack, a team is the brain center, guard presence its role is self-evident. Guards mental state, offensive awareness, attitudes and comprehensive competition personal skills, tactical ability to directly affect the team's overall offensive, about the victory. In the nearly 10 years of Asian Basketball Championships, the Chinese team offensive guard did not significantly improve the ability, but lost the original advantage, compared with the Asian team in the Elite Guard, there is a gap in the offensive capability. Therefore, this article by the overall strength of the Chinese team 26-28 session of the guard, technical level, comparative analysis of offensive capability, and nearly three Asian Basketball Championships China respectively guard Jordan, Iran, the Philippines defender Offensive Ability Comparative analysis to explore the advantages of this stage Chinese defender and problems, and make recommendations, intended to provide the model for the development of China and the Chinese man's basketball guard attack ability.In this paper, the use of literature, video observation, mathematical statistics, comparative analysis and other research methods to 26-28 Asian Basketball Championship, the Chinese team's offensive stats Guards and Guards spot performance based on Chinese guard offensive capability comparative study, the basic characteristics of the main body from the Chinese team defender, scoring, scoring, organizational skills, and the second offensive rebounding ability, the ability to fast break as well as Asian teams guards attack the ability to conduct a comparative study. Results obtained are as follows:(1) through the first 26-28 Asian Basketball Championship match, the Chinese team also successfully completed the replacement of old guard, by analyzing the physical characteristics and observation of Chinese video game guard, analyzes the average Chinese team defender Victor Levine index gradually increase the level of performance and physical confrontation gradually. Height gain some advantages in the Asian team, average age and average body weight compared with the Asian Elite Guard team is not dominant.(2) Chinese team gradually increased in the Guards scoring ability, but compared with the Asian Elite Guard, there are still some gaps. Mainly as follows:Shooting poor stability, the hit rate; with awareness week, slow; decisive shot, self-confidence and so on. Scoring mainly based outside long shot and layup, the Chinese team back in the game scoring more single.(3) Guards in the Chinese team on the organizational capacity has also been progress, especially the young Chinese team Guards temper after experiencing competition, domination and control of the ball in the ability, the ability to control the pace of the game have significantly improved, assists and organizational positions with the ability to attack no significant progress. In the game, the Chinese team on the organizational capacity Guards also showed a narrow field of vision, the ball is not in place, in the form of a single pass, to get rid of slow, not a good grasp for the team's offensive rhythm and the inability to fully mobilize the team enthusiasm of the players and other issues.(4) The ability and capacity of the Chinese team rebounding Guards presentation of the second attack weakened state, there is a certain gap compared with the Asian teams. Asian teams in rebounds will fight to show the ball, the ball will grab the state, while the Chinese team Guards is manifested in snatching a rebound is not strong, the attitude is not correct and so on. In the second attack capability Guards performance haunt way, or to pass the ball through a direct shot or offensive position, more rely on post players in singles, or tipped complete.(5) Chinese defender in the organization, the ability to launch the first fast break of the 26th and 28th were no significant differences, significantly lower than the 27th 26th and 28th. Observed through the game, the Chinese team back in the organization mobilizes stronger than the Asian team on the fast break ability. But also has the following problems:the fast break is not strong, mainly in single fast-break oriented; the break to complete the quality is not high, personal technology is not comprehensive enough guards; fast-break more mistakes, the success rate is not high.(6) The 26th Asian Basketball Championships, the Chinese team offensive guard in the overall strength of the weaker than Jordan.27th China defender eye-popping performance, and the ability to attack Iran defender compared, there is a large gap. The 28th round of the Chinese team offensive guard suppressed Philippine team; the overall strength of Guards guard is stronger than the Philippines.