Clinical Study Of Health Qigong·Six-character On Improving The Health Status Of TCM Five Organs In Sub-healthy People

ObjectiveThis thesis makes a introduction about a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial study of Health Qigong·Six-character.To assess the health and bias state of the five organs system of subhealthy people by using The five internal organs health questionnaire.On the basis of this,the author carry out the study on the intervention study of Health Qigong·Six-character,with the contrast of before and after the intervention in quality of life,health status,meridian detection,Inbody composition analysis.The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness of Health Qigong·Six-character for adjusting partial viscera functionand to evaluate the therapeutic effect of Health Qigong·Six-character for subhealthy people.And to form a standardized operation plan for the promotion of the Health Qigong·Six-character,and provide technical support for the“Preventive Treatment of Disease”project.MethodsThis thesis adopts Non-randomized controlled trial design with 48 subhealthy people in intervention group and 45 subhealthy people in blank control group.Among them,the Health Qigong·Six-character intervention group was divided into 3 months,6 months and 9 months,and the corresponding time was given to exercise Health Qigong·Six-character.The blank control group was divided into groups,but no intervention was allowed.To evaluate the efficacy of the patients each month by the MOF SF-36 questionnaire,the five internal organs health questionnaire,TCM meridian detection and Inbody composition analysis.These data collection to adopt SPSS18.0 statistical software to establish database were analyzed,and the analysis methods including descriptive statistics,the pair-matching rank-sum test and independent sample test(when the variancenot neat),repetitive measure analysis of variance,Multivariate analysis.Result1.Comparison of baseline data between the groups:A total of 121 patients were included in the study,28 were detached,and 93 were actually included.There were no statistically significant differences in gender,age composition between groups of patients(P?0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in scores of the five internal organs questionnaires before the intervention(P?0.05).Pre-intervention quality of life,9-month group had statistically significant differences in energy dimensions(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the other dimensions(P?0.05).2.Primary efficacy results(1)TCM internal organs health questionnaire:?Repeated measures analysis of variance analysis showed that the biased state of the five organs in the intervention group in March,June and September improved with time,but there was no statistical significance compared with the control group(P?0.05).?Comparison of the difference between the total score of the five internal organs and the scores of the organs in the group after intervention:3 months group:There was no significant difference between the groups(P?0.05);6 months group:the total scores of the five internal organs in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and the difference between the groups was statistically significant(P<0.05),which had a certain effect on the heart and liver.9 months group:There was no significant difference between the groups(P?0.05).In the three groups,the intervention group performed the comparison of the results of the viscera scores:the interventions at 3 months,6 months,and 9 months showed no significant difference in the scores of the Chinese medicine and internal organs(P?0.05).?Comparing the TCM five-organism health questionnaires and the each organ scorebefore and after intervention in each group.3 months intervention group:The total score of the five organs and the scores of heart,liver,spleen and lungs decreased compared with that before the intervention.Before and after comparison is statistically significant(P<0.05).Kidney scores decreased before intervention,and there was no statistically significant difference between before and after(P?0.05).3 months blank group:The total scores of the five organs and the scores of heart,liver,spleen,and lung were similar to those before,and were not statistically significant(P?0.05).Kidney scores increased before intervention,and there was difference between before and after(P<0.05),it is suggested that the biased condition of the kidney is worse than before;6 months intervention group:The total score of the five organs and the scores of heart,liver and lungs decreased compared with that before the intervention.Before and after comparison is statistically significant(P<0.05).The scoresoftheKidney and spleen decreased before intervention,and there was no statistically significant difference between before and after(P?0.05).6 months blank group:The total scores of the five organs and the scores of heart,liver,spleen,and lung were similar to those before,and were not statistically significant(P?0.05).9 months intervention group:The total score of the five organs and thescores of heart,liver and spleen decreased compared with that before the intervention.Before and after comparison is statistically significant(P<0.05).The scoresoftheKidney and lungs decreased before intervention,and there was no statistically significant difference between before and after(P?0.05).9 months blank group:The total scores of the five organs and the scores of heart,liver,spleen,and lung were similar to those before,andwere not statistically significant(P?0.05).(2)The MOF SF-36 questionnaire?Comparison of groups after intervention:There were statistically significant differences in the scores of the general health status and mental health dimensions between the 3 months control group and the 3 months blank group(P<0.05).And the intervention group scored higher than before.There were statistically significant differences in the scores of the physiological function,physiological function,general health condition and health change dimension between the 6 months control group and the 6 months blank group.There were statistically significant differences in the scores of the social function dimension between the 9 months control group and the 9 months blank group.The results of the intervention group's quality of life scale dimension scores in the three groups showed that there was no significant difference in the dimensions of the patients' quality of life scales at 3 months,6 months,and 9 months(P^0.05).Suggesting that the practice of different time,there is no difference in the impact of the patient quality of life scale.?Comparing the dimension of The MOF SF-36 questionnairebefore and after intervention in each group.In the Physiological function dimensionthe score of the intervention group rose more than before in the 3,6 and 9 months groups,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).The blank groups are not statistically significant(P?0.05).In the Physiological functional dimension:the score of the 3 monthss intervention group,3 months blank group and 6 months intervention grouprose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).In the Body pain dimension,the score of the 3 months intervention group and 9 months intervention grouprose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).In the General health status dimension,the score of the 3,6 and 9 months intervention group rose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).In the Social function dimension,the score of the 9 months intervention group and the 9 months blank group rose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).In the Emotional function and mental health dimensions,the score of the 3 months intervention group rose more than before,and itis statistically significant(P<0.05).In the Health change dimension,the score of the 3 months intervention group,3 months blank group and 6 months intervention group rose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)Body composition analysis:?Comparison of groups after intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in theBody composition analysis such as Body weight,body mass index,body fat percentage,visceral fat area in each group(P?0.05).?In the Body weight,the weight of the 3 months blank group and 6 months blank group rose more than before,and they are statistically significant(P<0.05).In the body mass index,the score of the 6 months blank group rose more than before,and it is statistically significant(P<0.05).But there were no statistically significant differences in the other groups(P?0.05).Conclusion1.In the effect of the Health Qigong·Six-character on the biased effect of the five internal organs of Chinese medicine,different evaluation methods have shown different results.From the perspective of multiple observations,the obvious advantages of the Health Qigofive-soil bias were not shown;the comparison of the viscera scores in the ng·Six-character to improve the intervention group in the three groups suggested that there was no difference in the health status of the five internal organs.Considering that the sample size of the included population is small and the research population is not targeted.The above conclusions suggest that the efficacy of the Health Qigong·Six-character to improve the bias of the five internal organs of Chinese medicine remains to be further examined.However,compared with the 6-month group,the 6-month practice time can improve the five-dirty state of the sub-health population,suggesting that the relevant research can be started from 6 months,providing some guidance for the research.At the same time,based on the improvement of each dirty bias,the bias of the spleen and kidneys is more difficult to improve than other organs,which may be related to the doctor's theory,suggesting that the two internal organs need to bestrengthened.2.Health Qigong·Six-character can improve the quality of the subject's quality of life,and can develop a personalized plan according to the characteristics of the quality of life of different groups of people.For the mental and general health conditions,the recommended practice time is 3 months;for health changes and social function dimensions,the recommended practice time is 6 months;for the social function dimension,it is recommended to practice 9 months;6 months of which However,in order to improve the quality of life,the practice time is the same,but different practice time has no significant difference in improving the quality of life.Considering that the sample size is small and the lack of relevant population is relevant,the efficacy of the Health Qigong·Six-character to improve the quality of life remains to be further studied and studied.3.In this study,Health Qigong·Six-character failed to improve Body weight,body mass index,body fat percentage and visceral fat area.It is suggested that Qigong research needs to find more sensitive objective evaluation indicators.