Font Size: a A A

Value Of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient In Assessing The Response To Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost For Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Posted on:2020-12-10Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y R WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2404330575954337Subject:Oncology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:To investigate efficacy,and toxicities of the modality of regular preoperative intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost?SIB-IMRT?or regular preoperative intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy?IMRT?in locally advanced rectal cancer?LARC?,and to use apparent diffusion coefficient?ADC?evaluating the response to Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy.Methods:64 patients with LARC were recruited and divided into regular-arm and boots-arm with 32 cases each nonrandomly.Both arms assigned to receive preoperative IMRT?50Gy/25f?concurrent 2 cycles capecitabine?1650mg/m2/d,twice daily,d1-d14,d22-d35?;boots-arm assigned to receive a SIB to the rectal tumor and high-risk recurrence area up to a total dose of 56Gy.Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of preoperative therapy.Botharmswereprospectivelyenrolledpre-andpostoperative chemoradiotherapy rectal high-resolution MRI.The ADC values were measured on the sequence of diffusion-weighted imaging?DWI?,with b value of1000s/mm2.Compared with the ypCR rate,tumor-downstaging?T-downstaging?rate,tumor regression grading?TRG?remission rate,sphincter preservation rate,effective rate and the changes of ADC related parameters between the arms.ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of ADC related parameters in the evaluation of ypCR.Results:1.All patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery.There were no statistical significant differences in gender,age,TN stage,clinical stage,tumor location,pathological differentiation degree,clinical stage,preoperative CEA level between the two groups?P?29?0.05?.2.In boots-arm,ypCR rate was 28.13%?9/34?,T-downstaging rate was84.38%?21/32?,TRG remission rate was 59.38%?19/32?,sphincter preservation rate was 78.13%?25/32?,and effective rate was 75.00%?25/32?.In regular-arm,ypCR rate was 12.50%?4/32?,T-downstaging rate was 56.25%?18/32?,TRG remission rate was 34.38%?11/32?,sphincter preservation rate was 53.13%?17/32?,and effective rate was 40.63%?13/32?.The T-downstaging rate,TRG remission rate,sphincter preservation rate and effective rate of treatment in boots-arm were higher than those in regular-arm?P?27?0.05?.3.There were no statistical significant differences in acute side effects,incidence of surgical complications and R0 resection rate?P?29?0.05?.4.The ADCpre,ADCpost,ADCdiffiff and ADCratioatio of boots-arm were?0.87±0.15??10-3mm2/s,?1.44±0.22??10-3mm2/s,?0.56±0.23??10-3mm2/s,?0.68±0.37?,respectively.The ADCpre,ADCpost,ADCdiffiff and ADCratioatio of regular-armwere?0.93±0.18??10-3mm2/s,?1.33±0.23??10-3mm2/s,?0.40±0.20??10-3mm2/s,?0.45±0.24?,respectively.ADCpost,ADCdiffiff and ADCratioatio in the boots-arm were higher than those in regular-arm,there were statistical significant differences in the latter two?P?27?0.05?.5.The ADCpostost and ADCdiffiff values had the diagnostic potential of predicting and evaluating ypCR?P?27?0.05?.The optimal cutoff value for the identification of patients with ypCR was 1.34?10-3mm2/s for ADCpost{during which its AUC was0.785[95%CI?0.699,0.901?],with 92.3%?12/13?sensitivity,58.8%?30/51?specificity,and 65.6%?42/64?accuracy,respectively},0.409?10-3mm2/s for ADCdiff{during which its AUC was 0.722[95%CI?0.573,0.872?],with84.6%?11/13?sensitivity,52.9%?27/51?specificity,and59.3%?38/64?,respectively}.Conclutions:1.Compared with regular IMRT,SIB-IMRT had better short-term efficacy,higher ADCdiffiff and ADCratio,toxicity and side effects were acceptable,long-term survival benefits awaited further follow-up.2.ADCpostost and ADCdiffiff had potential to predict and evaluate ypCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in LARC.
Keywords/Search Tags:locally advanced rectal cancer, simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy, apparent diffusion coefficient, pathological complete response
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Clinical Study Of Preperative Chemoradiation With A Simultaneous Integrated Boost For Rectal Cancer
Dosimetric And Clinical Study Of Preoperative Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy For Rectal Cancer
Diffusion Weighted Imaging For Evaluating Pathological Ccomplete Response To Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy For Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
The Clinical Trial Of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy For Locally Advanced Mid-low Rectal Cancer
Clinical Study Of Simultaneous Integrated Boost-intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy And Three Dimensional Comformal Radiation Therapy Treated Esophageal Cancer
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (SIB-IMRT) Concurrent With Tegafur,Gimeracil And Oteracil Porassium Capsules For Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Preliminary Evaluation Of Efficacy And Safety Of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clinic Research Of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy And Translational Research Of Prognostic Biomarkers Screening Based On Metabolomic Profiling In Locally Advanced Non-samll Cell Lung Cancer
Breast Conserving Surgery For Breast Cancer:Dosimestric Differences Between Sequential And Simultaneous Integrated Boost
10 The Dosimetry Study On The Simultaneous X-ray And The Late Course Electron Boost Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For The Treatment Of Breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery