A Clinical Study On The Treatment Of Mild And Moderate Generalized Anxiety Disorder (Gad) With Three Abdominal Canisters Combined With Antianxiety Drugs

Objective: The purpose of this study is to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of the oral treatment of mild to moderate generalized anxiety disorder(gad)by abdominal three-pot therapy combined with anxiolytic drug(sertraline hydrochloride),and to explore the clinical methods for the treatment of generalized anxiety,so as to provide clinical evidence for safe,effective and easy to operate antianxiety therapy.Methods: Sixty-four patients with generalized anxiety disorder(GAD)who met the standard of sodium discharge were randomized into the treatment group and the control group according to the order of visit,with 32 patients in each group.The treatment group received abdominal three-part pot therapy combined with oral administration of sertraline hydrochloride tablets,while the control group received oral administration of sertraline hydrochloride tablets alone,and 2 weeks as a course of treatment for a total of 6 weeks.Respectively before treatment,1 weekend of treatment,2 weekends of treatment,4weekends of treatment,and 6 weekends of treatment,the Hamilton Anxiety Inventory(HAMA)and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(STAI)were evaluated,and the adverse reaction symptoms were given after the end of treatment.Table(TESS)was used for evaluation.SPSS 22.0 statistical analysis was used for statistical processing.Results:1.Observation of main evaluation indicators: the HAMA scale scores of the treatment group and the control group were compared within and between the groups.After statistical test,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),indicating that both treatment schemes can reduce HAMA score,and the treatment difference appeared with the increase of treatment time,and the treatment group was superior to the control group.Two groups of HAMA scale spiritual factor and physical factor score was gradually decreasing trend,the comparison within and between groups,after statistics test,statistically significant difference(P < 0.05),indicating that both methods reduced mental and physical anxiety,Treatment differences as treatment time increases,and the treatment group is better than the control group.2.Comparison of evaluation results: after the course of treatment,the total effective rate of the treatment group and the control group were respectively 93.75% and 84.375%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The overall efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the control group.3.Observation of secondary evaluation indicators: the comparison of SAI scale scores between the two groups showed that the comparison within and between groups was statistically significant(P<0.05),that is,both treatment methods had the effect of improving the recent emotional changes,and the treatment difference appeared with the increase of treatment time,and the treatment group was superior to the control group.The comparison of TAI scale scores between the two groups showed that the intra-group and inter-group comparison was statistically significant(P<0.05),indicating that both treatment methods had the effect of improving long-term emotional changes,and the treatment difference appeared with the increase of treatment time,and the treatment group was superior to the control group.4.Observation of adverse reaction symptoms: no serious adverse events occurred in the two groups of patients during the trial.The comparison of TESS scores between the two groups showed that there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05),indicating that there was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups.Conclusion:1.In combination with sertraline hydrochloride tablets and alone oral sertraline hydrochloride tablets,abdominal three-part pot therapy for GAD can improve HAMA and STAI scale scores and relieve clinical symptoms.2.In the short course of treatment,the curative effect of the treatment group was the same as the control group,but with the increase of treatment time,the clinical curative effect of the treatment group was better than the control group,which had obviousadvantages in improving the somatic factors and long-term negative emotions of the patients.