Font Size: a A A

Comparing Hypofractionated With Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy In Treatment Of Postmastectomy Breast Cancer A Meto-analysis And Systematic Review

Posted on:2021-03-04Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L LiuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2404330605976752Subject:Oncology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer using meta-analysis.Material&Method:The PubMed,EMbase,Cochrane Library,Google Scholar,Wan Fang and CNKI databases were searched to identify controlled clinical trials comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer.Overall survival(OS)was the primary endpoint,and disease-free survival(DFS),locoregional recurrence(LRR),distant metastasis(DM),acute skin toxicity,acute lung toxicity,late skin toxicity,lymphedema,shoulder restriction,and late cardiac related toxicity were the secondary endpoints.The obtained data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0.The differences between two groups were estimated by calculating the odds ratio(OR)with 95%confidence interval(95%CI).Results:Twenty-five controlled clinical trials involving 3871 postmastectomy breast cancer patients were included in this meta-analysis according to the selection criteria.The meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in OS(OR=1.08,95%CI=0.87?1.33,P=0.49),DFS(OR=1.13,95%CI=0.91?1.40,P=0.28),LRR(OR=1.01,95%CI=0.76?1.33,P=0.96),DM(OR=1.16,95%CI=0.85?1.58,P=0.34),acute skin toxicity(OR=0.94,95%CI=0.67?1.32,P=0.72),acute lung toxicity(OR=0.94,95%CI=0.74-1.20,P=0.62),late skin toxicity(OR=0.98,95%CI=0.75?1.27,P=0.88),lymphedema(OR=0.99,95%CI=0.77?1.28,P=0.94),shoulder restriction(OR=0.75,95%CI=0.43?1.31,P=0.31),or late cardiac related toxicity(OR=1.17,95%CI=0.82?1.65,P=0.39)between the two groups.Conclusions:The results of this study show that compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy,hypofractionated radiotherapy is not significantly different with respect to efficacy or toxicity in postmastectomy breast cancer.Additional large randomized clinical trials are needed to further confirm this conclusion.
Keywords/Search Tags:Breast cancer, Hypofractionated radiotherapy, Conventional fractionated radiotherapy, Postmastectomy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
A Comparison Of Short-term Clinical Observation And Dosimetry For Hypofractionated Radiotherapy And Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy Of Early-breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery
Comparison Of Cardio-induced Heart Dieases After Hypofractionated Radiotherapy And Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy In Early Left-side Breast Cancer Patients Who Receieved Breast Conserving Surgery
Hot Radiotherapeutic Topic Analysis And Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy For Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
Discussion On The Curative Effect And Improved Location Method Of Hypofractionation And Conventional Radiotherapy After Breast Conserving Surgery
Clinical Study Of Preoperative Fractionation Radiotherapy And Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of The Esophagus
Comparison Of Efficacy And Safety Of Hypofractionated Fractionation And Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy After Breast Conserving Surgery For Early Breast Cancer
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy In Patients With Intermediate-to High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta Analysis
The Value Of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy For 1-3 Axillay Lymph Node-positive Stage ? Breast Cancer
Acute Side Effects And Psychological Influence Of Whole Breast Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Tumor Bed Boost On Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery
10 Radiotherapy After Surgery For Breast Cancer:Systematic Review