| In recent years,with the improvement of people's living material level,people's life style and living rules have greatly changed,but any kind of life style always has advantages and disadvantages.Although the material level has gone up,the following problems are people's life health problems,and chronic non-specific lower back pain is a common one,especially for young people.The purpose of this paper is to study the comprehensive method to treat chronic non-specific lower back pain Study on the effect of nonspecific lower back pain.Objective: to provide a better and effective treatment plan for clinical and rehabilitation treatment of non-specific lower back pain patients by comprehensive method(systematic evaluation + traditional therapy + functional training),and to provide theoretical support and practical basis for reducing the recurrence rate of non-specific lower back pain patients.Research methods: This paper uses the methods of literature,interview,experiment,mathematical statistics,etc.;literature method provides a reliable theoretical basis for this study by consulting the literature of relevant websites;interview method visits relevant sports rehabilitation experts and physical fitness experts for further understanding;the rehabilitation doctors with rich clinical experience conducted preliminary screening and diagnosis of patients,and selected 36 cases of chronic non-specific lower back pain patients diagnosed in the outpatient department of rehabilitation medical center of Hebei People's Hospital from September 2018 to December 2018 to be included in the study,including 20 men 16 cases were female.Randomly selected patients were divided into control group(no treatment)12 cases,experimental group 1(traditional rehabilitation therapy)12 cases,experimental group 2(comprehensive therapy)12 cases.Finally,five evaluation indexes are used to demonstrate the experimental results,which are: VAS score of patients' pain,muscle strength of extensor dorsi,range of trunk activity,assessment of disability of ODI patients and satisfaction of patients' rehabilitation effect.In this paper,spss25.0 data package is used to process the measured data,and t-test of paired samples is used to test the three groups of experimental data before and after the experiment In the group comparison after the experiment,the single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the three groups before and after the experiment.The mean ± standard deviation(m ± SD)was used as the standard for the effectiveness of the experimental intervention.P < 0.05 indicates significant difference,P < 0.01 indicates extremely significant difference.Results:(1)After 12 weeks of traditional rehabilitation treatment,the VAS score of the patients in this group decreased after the experiment compared with that before the experiment and after the experiment in the control group(P < 0.01),so it has extremely significant difference;at the same time,after 12 weeks of comprehensivetreatment intervention,the VAS score of the patients in this group after the experiment was compared with that before the experiment,after the experiment in the control group and after the experiment in the first group There was a significant difference between the two groups(P < 0.01).(2)After 12 weeks of traditional rehabilitation treatment,the muscle strength of extensor dorsi in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain was significantly higher than that before the experiment and after the experiment in the control group(P< 0.01);at the same time,after 12 weeks of comprehensive treatment,the muscle strength of extensor dorsi in patients in this group was significantly higher than that before and after the experiment in the control group(P < 0.01)Compared with the first group,the difference was significant(P < 0.01).(3)After 12 weeks of traditional rehabilitation treatment,the range of trunk activity of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain in this group increased after the experiment compared with that before the experiment and after the experiment in the control group(P < 0.01),so it has extremely significant difference;at the same time,after 12 weeks of comprehensive treatment by law,the range of trunk activity of patients in this group after the experiment was compared with that before and after the experiment in this group After the experiment,compared with the first group,there was a significant difference(P < 0.01).(4)After 12 weeks of traditional rehabilitation treatment,the ODI score of the patients in this group after the experiment was improved compared with that before the experiment and after the experiment in the control group(P < 0.01),so there was extremely significant difference;at the same time,after 12 weeks of comprehensive treatment intervention,the ODI score of the patients in this group after the experiment was compared with that before the experiment,after the experiment in the control group and after the experiment in the first group After the experiment,the difference was significant(P < 0.01).(5)After 12 weeks of traditional rehabilitation treatment,the rehabilitation satisfaction of patients in this group was improved after the experiment compared with that before the experiment and after the experiment in the control group(P <0.01),so there was a significant difference;at the same time,after 12 weeks of comprehensive treatment intervention,the rehabilitation satisfaction of patients in this group after the experiment was compared with that before and after the experiment in this group After the experiment in group A and group 1,the difference was significant(P < 0.01).Conclusion:(1)Traditional rehabilitation treatment has good effect on VAS score,extensor muscle strength,trunk activity range,ODI patients' dysfunction and rehabilitation satisfaction survey of patients with chronic non-specific lower back pain,which shows that traditional rehabilitation treatment has a good effect on young patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.(2)Comprehensive treatment has good effect on VAS score,extensor muscle strength,trunk activity range,ODI patients' dysfunction and rehabilitation satisfaction survey of patients with chronic low back pain,which shows that the comprehensive treatment has good effect on young patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.(3)Compared with the traditional rehabilitation treatment for chronic low back pain patients,the comprehensive method has a better effect on VAS score,back extensor muscle strength,trunk activity range,ODI patients' dysfunction,rehabilitation satisfaction survey,which shows that the comprehensive method has a better effective on the chronic non-specific low back pain patients than the traditional rehabilitation treatment. |
PDF Full Text Request