Research On Improving The Judicial Hearing System Of Examination And Arrest

Our country is in transition and social transformation period,social problems such as the traditional types of infectious diseases and natural disasters still constitute of people's lives and social security threats in the industrialization and urbanization is the symbol of the modernization process,but also continue to emerge and intensify some need of unemployment,accidents,labor conflicts and crime and other social problems facing.Among them,due to the high number of petitions caused by individual processes or trial results in the process of criminal cases,it makes the government's social management more difficult,and at the same time,it puts forward higher requirements for the judiciary to establish credibility and authority.With the development of the popularization of law,it is important for Chinese citizens to gain benefits,lose interests and be punished,but it is easier for people to be concerned about whether the procedure is fair or not.The hearing procedures of review arrested is absorption hearing kernel,the key procedure to arrest this criminal cases in the review,by the central subject(procuratorial organs and public security organs,the suspect,on behalf of the people's supervisors and lawyers)in a fair and open form to decide whether the suspect should be arrested program activities.The examination and arrest of the contact and supervision of the investigation stage,the connection of the prosecution work,with a clear procedural characteristics.The rational design and good implementation of the hearing procedure for review and arrest is based on the objective analysis of the current procedure,and the final purpose is to seek the best combination point to guarantee the smooth progress of criminal procedure and the protection of suspects' human rights.This article through the questionnaire on Shandong city of Dezhou province procuratorial organs for review of arrest cases of police officers to arrest the hearing procedures,operation,implementation effect and the next development plan of empirical investigation,in applying the research method of field and the use of value analysis,to examine and arrest judicial hearing more participationsystem in detail this understanding of the present stage of system construction and operation status,generated in operation and found the problem,such as:Investigators and police officers to review the arrest hearing more participation support degree is not high,multi subject case scope is not appropriate,the individual subject participation degree is low,not fully expounds personal opinions and ideas,find the deviation the operating procedures at the same time analysis problem is still not perfect,prosecutors justice questioned,the limitation of defense function After finding the problem,find out the solution to further guide the reform practice.Through the search of HowNet,the papers that are currently reviewed and arrested mostly focus on the study of the drawbacks of the traditional system,or analyze the construction of the judicial hearing system with the theory of law.In this paper,we take the theory of public administration as an example to analyze the judicial review of the judicial hearing in the judicial field.The author from the hearing procedures of review arrested interpretation and preliminary outline,from the evaluation of the current situation and the front-line staff summed up the shortcomings and find out the direction of improvement,although only discussed the countermeasures,still expect for future multi center participation of review arrested construction work standardization,legalization can play a role,for the innovation of government functions,change the traditional methods of social governance provide material.