The Analyzation Of Li Xianfu's Prosecution Case For Administrative Compensation Of House Expropriation By People's Government Of Shou County

With the development of urbanization in China,the problem of urban housing expropriation and compensation has always been a hot issue in the society.In judicial practice,compensation is the core of administrative disputes.Therefore,cases involving decisions on urban housing expropriation and compensation occupy a large proportion in administrative litigation.In the process of urban housing expropriation and compensation,there are obviously a lot of problems and contradictions.In order to better carry out the urban housing levy and compensation work,we need to actively solve the important contradictions in the process of expropriation and compensation.According to Li Xianfu v.Shouxian County people's government housing levy administrative compensation case,on the basis of the existing legislation,analyzes the defendant made the housing levy and compensation for determining compliance with the statutory procedures,assessment agencies choose whether fair and reasonable illegal buildings housing compensation without registration standards and other issues,put forward relevant recommendations:improving the city housing levy and compensation of the hearing system to ensure the legitimacy of the housing levy and compensation programs;improve the assessment mechanism of city housing levy and compensation to determine the problem to ensure the Fairness Evaluation Institution Selection;clear illegal construction in unregistered housing compensation standards to ensure the rationality of the housing levy and compensation process.