Font Size: a A A

Research On Judicial Responsibility System Of Dalian Intermediate People’s Court

Posted on:2019-07-31Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C H TengFull Text:PDF
GTID:2416330548993963Subject:Public administration
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The emphasis of the reform of the judicial system is to improve the classification and management of the judicial personnel,improve the judicial responsibility system,improve the system of the professional security of the judicial personnel,and promote the unified management of the people’s property and property under the provincial court and the procuratorate.Through reform,we should establish a scientific judicial system that focuses on trial,achieves judicial justice,establishes judicial authority,improves judicial efficiency,and achieves judicial convenience.The judicial responsibility system is the main line of the reform of the judicial system,and the general secretary of Xi Jinping has repeatedly stressed that the judicial reform should hold the "bull nose" of the judicial responsibility system and try to make the people feel fair and justice in every judicial case.We should clarify the power and responsibility of judges,and establish a sound judicial responsibility system,so as to ensure the orderly conduct of trials.The construction of judicial responsibility system has always been accompanied by the whole course of judicial development.As the only subject in the exercise of judicial power,the judicial power has become a double-edged sword.By exercising independent judicial power to safeguard judicial authority and realize legal justice,on the contrary,if the trial personnel overstep the bottom line,it is inevitable.It will affect the outcome of the referee and damage the judicial justice.If it is serious,the law will also lose its regulatory role.The intermediate people’s Court of Dalian has always promoted the construction of judicial responsibility system and has shown certain achievements.However,according to the established goal of the reform of the judicial responsibility system,there are still some shortcomings.It still needs to be combined with the actual situation to analyze the gap,which is mainly reflected in the following:the first is the lack of power and responsibility,the cross of power and the pursuit of responsibility.The two is that the strength of the trial main body is insufficient,the trial pressure is great,the power guarantee still needs to be perfected;the three is the lack of the accountability system,and the regulation and punishment measures have not actually played the role of regulation and punishment.By using the theory of the unity of power and responsibility,the theory of power balance and the theory of public choice,this paper discusses the scientificalness and necessity of the reform of the judicial responsibility system,and provides a rich theoretical basis for the reform of the judicial responsibility system,and the more scientific,forward-looking and practical of the proposed reform scheme.To read a lot of literature with literature research method,to understand the current situation of the implementation of judicial responsibility system at home and abroad,to understand the basic situation and background of the reform through the questionnaire survey method,and to sum up the experience and lessons of the reform of other urban judicial responsibility system by using the experience summary method.Through systematic investigation and research,this paper makes a comprehensive comparison and analysis of the reasons for the problems in the reform of the judicial responsibility system,and puts forward the relative pertinent and feasible reform measures combined with the problems and reasons.We hope to promote the reform of the judicial responsibility system of the Dalian intermediate people’s court through the above aspects,to build an efficient judicial trial operation system,to create a good judicial trial environment,to maintain judicial justice and promote the positive role of the judicial credibility.
Keywords/Search Tags:Judicial responsibility system, Judicial responsibility reform, Integration of rights and responsibilities
PDF Full Text Request
Related items