A Comparative Research Of The Investigative Power Of The Supervisory Committee And The Power Of Criminal Investigation Under The Background Of National Supervision System Reform

For a long time,corruption has been a major problem that plagues all countries in the world,and China is no exception.Corruption has a series of serious harmfulness,such as destroying the Party's honesty,social fairness and justice,wasting the country's social resources,deteriorating the relationship between the government and the people,and hindering economic development.If we do not solve corruption fundamentally,it will seriously affect the long-term development of the country.Since the Eighteenth National Congress,the Party and the state have made unprecedented efforts to punish corruption,and the effect of punishment is obvious.But corruption still occurs from time to time.In this context,in order to combat corruption thoroughly and effectively,China has initiated the process of reform of the national supervision system.In the process of the reform of our country's supervision system,the supervisory committee has replaced the procuratorial organ as the new jurisdiction subject of duty crime,and the distribution mode of duty crime investigation power has been greatly adjusted,which has had a far-reaching impact in the criminal justice and even the whole legal field.The power of investigation is the most important in a series of contents of supervision power.Although there are important similarities between the power of investigation and the power of investigation in terms of connotation,mode of exercise and system settings,they can not be completely equated,that is to say,there are similarities and differences between them.Therefore,the comparative study of investigative power and investigative power has become a relatively new research direction under the background of the reform of supervision system.At present,scholars in academia have discussed more about the construction of the national supervision system after the reform and the connection between the "Supervision Law" and the legal system of our country.However,there are few in-depth studies on the similarities and differences between the theory and practice of the supervision and investigation power resulting from the reform and the traditional investigation power.The comparison between the investigation power and the investigation power has become a theoretical research in today's academia.A relatively vacant aspect.Therefore,it is necessary to make a comparative study of investigative power and investigative power.Starting from the definition of the two powers,this paperdeeply analyses the similarities and differences between them from three aspects:source of power,connotation of right and boundary of power,and then finds out the problems existing in the investigative power.On this basis,it puts forward the way to improve the investigative power,so as to better run the investigative power and improve the anti-corruption of the country.Cheng's better development provides corresponding feasible countermeasures.