Study On Legal System Of Food Safety Risk Exchange In China

In the international context where all countries in the world are strongly advocating food safety issues,China's new food safety law has finally established the legal system of food safety risk exchange.At present,China's food safety risk exchange is a one-way information release system,which lacks the interaction and communication between the public,industry,academia and other stakeholders.Although our country "food safety law" article 23 established the basic legal system of risk communication in principle,but the academic circles about the field of research is still in the exploratory stage,the achievements are scattered in the legal field,mainly with the introduction of the system of foreign exchange risk and experience,little research in the field of law,practice and more.And "food safety",after all,is a basic law in the field of food safety management,the provisions of article 23 the very principle and general,maneuverability to improve,to make the new system can really from "paper law" to "law in action",give full play to the role of,also need to more specific,meticulous,this system design specification.The research methods adopted in this paper are mainly comparative methods.External level is to compare China's legal system of food safety risk exchange with that of other countries in the world.The main countries listed in this paper are the United States,European Union,Australia and Japan.On the internal level,China's food safety risk related systems at all stages in history are summarized and compared,and the legal system for food safety risk exchange is compared with other relevant legal systems.Based on the whole process of food safety risk communication,this paper analyzes and discusses the related system defects and theoretical deficiencies.At the present stage,as China has just established the legal system of food safety risk communication,there are some defects in the subject of risk communication,the way of risk communication,the content of risk communication,and the duty to remember.In terms of the main body of risk communication,risk communication related main body status of inequality will directly lead to problems in the process of risk communication initiative,thus affecting the effect of risk communication,second is mainly responsible for food safety risk communication of national food safety risk assessment center did not occupy the main body status,easily controlled by other units,and the importance of the news media to food safety risk communication effect.In terms of the way of communication,the author thinks that the prior communication should be taken to a more important position,because the purpose of the communication of food safety risks is to prevent beforehand rather than to remedy afterwards.There are many ways of communication in the technical guide of food safety risk communication,but such an exhaustive list also restricts specific practice.In terms of the content of the communication,the content of the food safety risk communication is mainly about the food safety standards.However,at the present stage,only the results of this standard are disclosed and the process of how this standard is formulated is not published and communicated.However,this is the content that the public pays great attention to.This paper will start with the analysis of the food safety risk exchange system and propose the corresponding solutions.The innovation of this paper is to put forward the corresponding responsibility accountability mechanism,in order to make the food safety risk communication system get good communication effect,it is necessary to carry out the responsibility of the relevant subject responsibility allocation,clear the responsibility of each related subject specific content,and will communicate as a food business operator's obligations written to the food safety law.Of course,this is only the ideal construction in theory,and many problems will be encountered in the concrete practice.The deficiency of this innovative point of view is that there is a certain gap between the implementation of practice and the construction of theory,which cannot be avoided.